NUMBER AND PERCENT OF NC RESIDENT BIRTHS DELIVERED BY GESTATION
2019-2023

  GESTATION TOTAL
Less than 37 weeks (Preterm) 37+ Weeks Unknown
N PERCENT N PERCENT N PERCENT N
NORTH CAROLINA 64164 10.7 533176 89.2 263 0.0 597603
COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: 1070 11.3 8397 88.7 5 0.1 9472
ALAMANCE
ALEXANDER 180 10.2 1578 89.8 0 0.0 1758
ALLEGHANY 45 9.1 448 90.7 1 0.2 494
ANSON 180 13.6 1143 86.4 0 0.0 1323
ASHE 135 13.0 906 86.9 1 0.1 1042
AVERY 82 11.9 608 88.0 1 0.1 691
BEAUFORT 274 12.6 1901 87.3 3 0.1 2178
BERTIE 131 16.2 675 83.6 1 0.1 807
BLADEN 221 12.5 1550 87.5 0 0.0 1771
BRUNSWICK 561 10.3 4903 89.7 1 0.0 5465
BUNCOMBE 1320 11.0 10704 89.0 1 0.0 12025
BURKE 430 10.1 3840 89.9 1 0.0 4271
CABARRUS 1427 10.8 11740 89.1 7 0.1 13174
CALDWELL 446 11.4 3454 88.5 1 0.0 3901
CAMDEN 54 11.5 414 88.5 0 0.0 468
CARTERET 218 8.9 2244 91.1 1 0.0 2463
CASWELL 116 11.9 855 88.1 0 0.0 971
CATAWBA 843 10.2 7423 89.7 13 0.2 8279
CHATHAM 356 10.7 2976 89.3 1 0.0 3333
CHEROKEE 125 10.3 1092 89.6 2 0.2 1219
CHOWAN 92 13.5 587 86.3 1 0.1 680
CLAY 36 8.6 385 91.4 0 0.0 421
CLEVELAND 612 10.9 5025 89.1 2 0.0 5639
COLUMBUS 356 12.2 2560 87.8 0 0.0 2916
CRAVEN 660 10.3 5726 89.6 5 0.1 6391
CUMBERLAND 3022 11.5 23165 88.4 4 0.0 26191
CURRITUCK 147 9.6 1384 90.4 0 0.0 1531
DARE 140 9.2 1376 90.6 2 0.1 1518
DAVIDSON 1095 12.4 7723 87.6 2 0.0 8820
DAVIE 222 11.1 1777 88.9 0 0.0 1999
DUPLIN 399 11.2 3159 88.6 8 0.2 3566
DURHAM 2055 10.0 18496 89.9 14 0.1 20565
EDGECOMBE 392 13.5 2512 86.4 2 0.1 2906
FORSYTH 2586 11.7 19480 88.2 10 0.0 22076
FRANKLIN 418 10.1 3717 89.9 1 0.0 4136
GASTON 1470 10.9 11984 89.0 12 0.1 13466
GATES 42 9.0 425 91.0 0 0.0 467
GRAHAM 53 11.9 392 88.1 0 0.0 445
GRANVILLE 343 11.4 2664 88.6 1 0.0 3008
GREENE 139 13.4 896 86.6 0 0.0 1035
GUILFORD 3375 11.5 26004 88.4 27 0.1 29406
HALIFAX 382 14.8 2197 85.1 3 0.1 2582
HARNETT 946 10.1 8394 89.9 1 0.0 9341
HAYWOOD 317 12.1 2304 87.9 0 0.0 2621
HENDERSON 548 10.8 4532 89.2 3 0.1 5083
HERTFORD 143 14.9 818 85.1 0 0.0 961
HOKE 499 11.4 3873 88.5 4 0.1 4376
HYDE 17 9.4 159 88.3 4 2.2 180
IREDELL 1044 10.6 8778 89.3 6 0.1 9828
JACKSON 210 12.3 1497 87.7 0 0.0 1707
JOHNSTON 1236 9.2 12260 90.8 2 0.0 13498
JONES 46 9.8 425 90.2 0 0.0 471
LEE 492 12.5 3428 87.4 1 0.0 3921
LENOIR 418 13.0 2809 87.0 0 0.0 3227
LINCOLN 447 9.9 4081 90.0 6 0.1 4534
MCDOWELL 260 13.0 1739 87.0 0 0.0 1999
MACON 197 12.2 1416 87.8 0 0.0 1613
MADISON 98 10.5 839 89.5 0 0.0 937
MARTIN 153 13.9 945 86.1 0 0.0 1098
MECKLENBURG 7568 10.2 66667 89.8 20 0.0 74255
MITCHELL 88 13.9 543 86.1 0 0.0 631
MONTGOMERY 150 11.3 1169 88.4 3 0.2 1322
MOORE 535 9.0 5400 90.9 4 0.1 5939
NASH 672 12.6 4642 87.3 4 0.1 5318
NEW HANOVER 1159 10.7 9643 89.2 9 0.1 10811
NORTHAMPTON 95 11.7 716 88.3 0 0.0 811
ONSLOW 1793 9.4 17212 90.6 0 0.0 19005
ORANGE 526 9.1 5278 90.9 2 0.0 5806
PAMLICO 49 11.1 390 88.6 1 0.2 440
PASQUOTANK 229 10.0 2058 89.9 1 0.0 2288
PENDER 376 11.5 2897 88.5 0 0.0 3273
PERQUIMANS 51 9.3 500 90.7 0 0.0 551
PERSON 274 12.9 1852 87.1 1 0.0 2127
PITT 1337 13.1 8871 86.8 9 0.1 10217
POLK 59 8.6 624 91.4 0 0.0 683
RANDOLPH 879 11.3 6912 88.7 3 0.0 7794
RICHMOND 384 13.9 2380 86.0 3 0.1 2767
ROBESON 1016 11.2 8067 88.8 2 0.0 9085
ROCKINGHAM 511 11.2 4051 88.8 1 0.0 4563
ROWAN 896 11.3 7058 88.7 2 0.0 7956
RUTHERFORD 375 11.7 2822 88.2 1 0.0 3198
SAMPSON 472 11.9 3495 88.0 5 0.1 3972
SCOTLAND 248 12.7 1706 87.3 1 0.1 1955
STANLY 344 9.9 3124 90.1 0 0.0 3468
STOKES 217 11.1 1740 88.9 0 0.0 1957
SURRY 423 11.2 3366 88.8 1 0.0 3790
SWAIN 109 13.8 679 86.2 0 0.0 788
TRANSYLVANIA 131 10.7 1088 89.3 0 0.0 1219
TYRRELL 12 6.5 171 92.9 1 0.5 184
UNION 1211 9.9 11022 90.1 1 0.0 12234
VANCE 354 13.1 2340 86.9 0 0.0 2694
WAKE 5676 8.8 58864 91.2 9 0.0 64549
WARREN 125 15.0 710 85.0 0 0.0 835
WASHINGTON 76 13.3 497 86.7 0 0.0 573
WATAUGA 154 10.0 1384 89.9 2 0.1 1540
WAYNE 925 11.5 7111 88.5 3 0.0 8039
WILKES 414 12.3 2949 87.5 9 0.3 3372
WILSON 592 13.0 3966 86.9 4 0.1 4562
YADKIN 236 12.5 1653 87.5 0 0.0 1889
YANCEY 102 11.6 777 88.4 0 0.0 879

PREPARED BY NC-DHHS STATE CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS
NOTE: RATES BASED ON SMALL NUMBERS (FEWER THAN 20 CASES)
ARE UNSTABLE AND SHOULD BE INTERPRETED WITH CAUTION
*NOTE: OBSTETRIC ESTIMATE OF GESTATION IS NOW USED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS GUIDELINES