2013-2017 N.C. LIVE BIRTHS WITH AGE OF MOTHER 30 OR MORE
BY COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: NUMBER AT RISK DUE TO HIGH PARITY
AND PERCENT OF ALL BIRTHS WITH AGE OF MOTHER 30 OR MORE
**INDICATOR OF NEED FOR FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES**

RESIDENCE HIGH
PARITY
BIRTHS
PERCENT
HIGH
PARITY
NORTH CAROLINA 54,204 22.2
ALAMANCE 811 23.5
ALEXANDER 105 18.2
ALLEGHANY 28 19.9
ANSON 77 24.6
ASHE 77 20.2
AVERY 59 22.2
BEAUFORT 188 24.6
BERTIE 44 18.6
BLADEN 112 21.8
BRUNSWICK 419 20.8
BUNCOMBE 1,332 21.6
BURKE 285 21.9
CABARRUS 1,175 21.5
CALDWELL 227 21.7
CAMDEN 31 16.9
CARTERET 217 17.3
CASWELL 92 27.1
CATAWBA 669 23.2
CHATHAM 416 24.9
CHEROKEE 77 24.1
CHOWAN 45 22.8
CLAY 21 15.6
CLEVELAND 317 22.2
COLUMBUS 174 23.3
CRAVEN 450 20.9
CUMBERLAND 1,957 24.3
CURRITUCK 97 18.0
DARE 209 24.0
DAVIDSON 621 22.8
DAVIE 169 23.0
DUPLIN 306 26.5
DURHAM 2,512 22.5
EDGECOMBE 234 31.2
FORSYTH 2,083 22.1
FRANKLIN 366 28.1
GASTON 981 23.1
GATES 35 22.4
GRAHAM 15 17.0
GRANVILLE 288 26.3
GREENE 100 29.9
GUILFORD 3,087 23.8
HALIFAX 184 24.9
HARNETT 814 23.4
HAYWOOD 178 18.8
HENDERSON 430 20.5
HERTFORD 87 25.3
HOKE 368 23.5
HYDE 24 28.2
IREDELL 735 19.8
JACKSON 138 22.6
JOHNSTON 1,032 22.0
JONES 42 29.4
LEE 347 26.1
LENOIR 264 28.2
LINCOLN 293 20.7
MCDOWELL 148 23.2
MACON 114 20.8
MADISON 60 19.6
MARTIN 94 25.9
MECKLENBURG 8,033 21.4
MITCHELL 43 21.5
MONTGOMERY 129 30.4
MOORE 527 21.8
NASH 483 27.8
NEW HANOVER 1,152 20.4
NORTHAMPTON 65 28.0
ONSLOW 878 18.0
ORANGE 746 20.3
PAMLICO 34 21.9
PASQUOTANK 181 21.6
PENDER 301 22.6
PERQUIMANS 32 17.7
PERSON 164 23.6
PITT 860 21.3
POLK 61 24.3
RANDOLPH 600 23.3
RICHMOND 185 27.6
ROBESON 610 26.2
ROCKINGHAM 336 23.6
ROWAN 543 22.0
RUTHERFORD 240 25.3
SAMPSON 303 23.1
SCOTLAND 108 21.9
STANLY 210 19.9
STOKES 133 21.2
SURRY 264 23.4
SWAIN 67 29.9
TRANSYLVANIA 114 23.1
TYRRELL 21 28.0
UNION 1,371 23.7
VANCE 233 31.2
WAKE 7,598 20.7
WARREN 84 30.7
WASHINGTON 45 30.6
WATAUGA 188 20.3
WAYNE 639 24.2
WILKES 236 24.6
WILSON 346 23.3
YADKIN 132 22.2
YANCEY 49 20.7

PREPARED BY NC-DHHS STATE CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS
NOTE: RATES BASED ON SMALL NUMBERS (FEWER THAN 20 CASES)
ARE UNSTABLE AND SHOULD BE INTERPRETED WITH CAUTION