NUMBER AND PERCENT OF NC RESIDENT BIRTHS DELIVERED BY GESTATION
2013-2017

  GESTATION TOTAL
Less than 37 weeks (Preterm) 37+ Weeks Unknown
N PERCENT N PERCENT N PERCENT N
NORTH CAROLINA 61035 10.1 540209 89.8 377 0.1 601621
COUNTY OF RESIDENCE: 1000 11.0 8127 89.0 1 0.0 9128
ALAMANCE
ALEXANDER 162 9.1 1610 90.9 0 0.0 1772
ALLEGHANY 57 11.5 437 88.5 0 0.0 494
ANSON 156 12.5 1094 87.5 1 0.1 1251
ASHE 116 10.5 991 89.5 0 0.0 1107
AVERY 81 12.1 590 87.9 0 0.0 671
BEAUFORT 260 11.2 2060 88.7 2 0.1 2322
BERTIE 115 13.1 765 86.9 0 0.0 880
BLADEN 200 11.5 1534 88.4 1 0.1 1735
BRUNSWICK 500 9.7 4632 90.2 4 0.1 5136
BUNCOMBE 1270 9.9 11576 90.1 7 0.1 12853
BURKE 422 9.5 4001 90.3 9 0.2 4432
CABARRUS 1137 9.3 11031 90.6 7 0.1 12175
CALDWELL 405 10.1 3621 89.9 2 0.0 4028
CAMDEN 44 9.5 417 90.3 1 0.2 462
CARTERET 318 10.7 2647 89.3 0 0.0 2965
CASWELL 118 11.5 906 88.5 0 0.0 1024
CATAWBA 807 9.4 7730 90.4 11 0.1 8548
CHATHAM 323 10.1 2860 89.7 4 0.1 3187
CHEROKEE 142 12.6 981 87.4 0 0.0 1123
CHOWAN 74 10.5 630 89.5 0 0.0 704
CLAY 51 11.6 387 88.2 1 0.2 439
CLEVELAND 590 11.1 4722 88.8 3 0.1 5315
COLUMBUS 341 11.3 2686 88.6 4 0.1 3031
CRAVEN 634 8.7 6643 91.2 6 0.1 7283
CUMBERLAND 3168 11.4 24570 88.5 18 0.1 27756
CURRITUCK 117 9.0 1177 90.9 1 0.1 1295
DARE 162 9.5 1538 90.4 1 0.1 1701
DAVIDSON 1031 11.8 7729 88.2 3 0.0 8763
DAVIE 191 10.0 1714 90.0 0 0.0 1905
DUPLIN 332 9.2 3291 90.8 3 0.1 3626
DURHAM 2098 9.8 19327 90.1 29 0.1 21454
EDGECOMBE 372 12.1 2697 87.9 0 0.0 3069
FORSYTH 2621 11.8 19652 88.2 4 0.0 22277
FRANKLIN 348 10.0 3113 89.8 4 0.1 3465
GASTON 1283 10.2 11315 89.7 22 0.2 12620
GATES 74 14.4 439 85.4 1 0.2 514
GRAHAM 43 10.3 376 89.7 0 0.0 419
GRANVILLE 288 10.2 2535 89.7 3 0.1 2826
GREENE 126 12.2 910 87.8 0 0.0 1036
GUILFORD 3290 10.7 27510 89.2 25 0.1 30825
HALIFAX 371 12.9 2505 87.1 1 0.0 2877
HARNETT 929 9.9 8457 90.1 2 0.0 9388
HAYWOOD 318 10.8 2618 89.1 1 0.0 2937
HENDERSON 504 9.4 4848 90.6 0 0.0 5352
HERTFORD 150 13.0 1004 86.9 2 0.2 1156
HOKE 492 10.7 4124 89.3 2 0.0 4618
HYDE 19 8.8 198 91.2 0 0.0 217
IREDELL 884 9.6 8349 90.4 6 0.1 9239
JACKSON 198 10.3 1728 89.7 0 0.0 1926
JOHNSTON 1053 9.3 10310 90.7 10 0.1 11373
JONES 45 9.4 434 90.4 1 0.2 480
LEE 401 10.4 3448 89.3 10 0.3 3859
LENOIR 348 10.8 2885 89.2 3 0.1 3236
LINCOLN 369 9.3 3606 90.7 1 0.0 3976
MCDOWELL 255 11.1 2042 88.9 1 0.0 2298
MACON 201 11.8 1506 88.1 3 0.2 1710
MADISON 99 10.0 890 89.9 1 0.1 990
MARTIN 156 12.7 1075 87.3 1 0.1 1232
MECKLENBURG 7156 9.8 65519 90.1 27 0.0 72702
MITCHELL 87 12.2 623 87.6 1 0.1 711
MONTGOMERY 158 10.5 1340 89.4 1 0.1 1499
MOORE 515 9.7 4783 90.2 6 0.1 5304
NASH 538 10.1 4780 89.7 8 0.2 5326
NEW HANOVER 1090 9.6 10244 90.3 8 0.1 11342
NORTHAMPTON 112 12.2 805 87.8 0 0.0 917
ONSLOW 1746 8.4 19137 91.6 4 0.0 20887
ORANGE 492 8.3 5463 91.7 4 0.1 5959
PAMLICO 49 11.5 376 88.5 0 0.0 425
PASQUOTANK 261 10.5 2222 89.5 0 0.0 2483
PENDER 377 12.0 2755 87.9 3 0.1 3135
PERQUIMANS 52 8.3 571 91.5 1 0.2 624
PERSON 191 9.0 1919 90.9 2 0.1 2112
PITT 1225 11.7 9239 88.2 9 0.1 10473
POLK 85 11.4 663 88.6 0 0.0 748
RANDOLPH 786 9.9 7132 90.0 8 0.1 7926
RICHMOND 335 12.5 2351 87.4 3 0.1 2689
ROBESON 1010 11.1 8068 88.8 3 0.0 9081
ROCKINGHAM 482 10.4 4134 89.5 2 0.0 4618
ROWAN 767 9.7 7136 90.2 8 0.1 7911
RUTHERFORD 321 9.5 3042 90.4 1 0.0 3364
SAMPSON 434 10.4 3746 89.4 8 0.2 4188
SCOTLAND 237 10.6 2002 89.3 2 0.1 2241
STANLY 389 11.3 3066 88.7 1 0.0 3456
STOKES 236 12.0 1736 88.0 0 0.0 1972
SURRY 347 9.4 3345 90.6 0 0.0 3692
SWAIN 101 10.7 845 89.3 0 0.0 946
TRANSYLVANIA 134 9.8 1226 89.9 3 0.2 1363
TYRRELL 11 5.1 203 94.9 0 0.0 214
UNION 1068 9.0 10755 91.0 1 0.0 11824
VANCE 339 12.1 2450 87.7 5 0.2 2794
WAKE 5785 9.1 57832 90.9 26 0.0 63643
WARREN 109 11.8 814 88.2 0 0.0 923
WASHINGTON 77 12.1 560 87.9 0 0.0 637
WATAUGA 196 10.7 1631 89.2 2 0.1 1829
WAYNE 845 10.2 7452 89.8 1 0.0 8298
WILKES 405 11.9 2983 88.0 2 0.1 3390
WILSON 543 11.4 4201 88.5 4 0.1 4748
YADKIN 193 10.1 1717 89.9 0 0.0 1910
YANCEY 92 11.0 745 89.0 0 0.0 837

PREPARED BY NC-DHHS STATE CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS
NOTE: RATES BASED ON SMALL NUMBERS (FEWER THAN 20 CASES)
ARE UNSTABLE AND SHOULD BE INTERPRETED WITH CAUTION
*NOTE: OBSTETRIC ESTIMATE OF GESTATION IS NOW USED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH
NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS GUIDELINES