2020 NORTH CAROLINA INFANT MORTALITY REPORT, TABLE 2 |
North Carolina Resident Infant Death Rates (per 1,000 live births) |
by Perinatal Care Region (PCR) and County of Residence: 2019, 2020, and 2016-2020 |
Residence: | 2019 Infant Deaths |
2019 Rate | 2020 Infant Deaths |
2020 Rate | 2016-2020 Infant Deaths |
2016-2020 Rate |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NORTH CAROLINA | 810 | 6.8 | 803 | 6.9 | 4144 | 7.0 | |||
PCR I | 41 | 5.6 | 44 | 6.4 | 218 | 6.0 | |||
PCR II | 208 | 8.2 | 161 | 6.5 | 993 | 7.9 | |||
PCR III | 145 | 5.9 | 144 | 5.8 | 739 | 5.9 | |||
PCR IV | 170 | 6.4 | 166 | 6.4 | 814 | 6.2 | |||
PCR V | 119 | 6.7 | 133 | 7.7 | 693 | 7.8 | |||
PCR VI | 127 | 7.4 | 155 | 9.2 | 687 | 8.0 | |||
ALAMANCE | 8 | 4.3 | * | 11 | 6.0 | 54 | 5.7 | ||
ALEXANDER | 3 | 8.4 | * | 1 | 2.9 | * | 15 | 8.5 | |
ALLEGHANY | 1 | 12.7 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 2 | 4.3 | * |
ANSON | 3 | 11.8 | * | 5 | 18.0 | * | 13 | 9.9 | |
ASHE | 0 | 0.0 | * | 2 | 8.6 | * | 5 | 4.7 | * |
AVERY | 0 | 0.0 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 2 | 2.9 | * |
BEAUFORT | 5 | 11.5 | * | 6 | 14.0 | * | 21 | 9.6 | |
BERTIE | 1 | 6.2 | * | 3 | 16.9 | * | 10 | 11.4 | |
BLADEN | 2 | 5.8 | * | 4 | 11.6 | * | 16 | 9.3 | |
BRUNSWICK | 5 | 4.9 | * | 3 | 3.0 | * | 33 | 6.6 | |
BUNCOMBE | 12 | 4.9 | 16 | 6.9 | 64 | 5.2 | |||
BURKE | 6 | 6.7 | * | 5 | 6.3 | * | 33 | 7.5 | |
CABARRUS | 15 | 5.9 | 10 | 3.9 | 68 | 5.4 | |||
CALDWELL | 11 | 12.5 | 6 | 8.2 | * | 30 | 7.5 | ||
CAMDEN | 0 | 0 | * | 0 | 0 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * |
CARTERET | 1 | 1.9 | * | 4 | 8.4 | * | 16 | 6.1 | |
CASWELL | 3 | 14.4 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 9 | 8.9 | * |
CATAWBA | 8 | 4.7 | * | 7 | 4.4 | * | 43 | 5.2 | |
CHATHAM | 4 | 6.6 | * | 8 | 12.4 | * | 30 | 9.4 | |
CHEROKEE | 3 | 12.2 | * | 2 | 8.2 | * | 14 | 11.4 | |
CHOWAN | 0 | 0.0 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 2 | 3.1 | * |
CLAY | 0 | 0.0 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 3 | 6.6 | * |
CLEVELAND | 7 | 6.1 | * | 5 | 4.6 | * | 45 | 8.2 | |
COLUMBUS | 5 | 8.9 | * | 5 | 8.7 | * | 26 | 9.1 | |
CRAVEN | 7 | 5.3 | * | 9 | 6.9 | * | 49 | 7.2 | |
CUMBERLAND | 37 | 6.8 | 50 | 9.8 | 226 | 8.4 | |||
CURRITUCK | 1 | 3.9 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 4 | 3.0 | * |
DARE | 1 | 3.2 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 1 | 0.6 | * |
DAVIDSON | 8 | 4.5 | * | 9 | 5.3 | * | 59 | 6.7 | |
DAVIE | 4 | 10.0 | * | 6 | 15.5 | * | 14 | 7.1 | |
DUPLIN | 4 | 5.6 | * | 9 | 12.9 | * | 29 | 8.3 | |
DURHAM | 32 | 7.7 | 25 | 6.2 | 128 | 6.1 | |||
EDGECOMBE | 5 | 8.7 | * | 7 | 11.8 | * | 35 | 11.8 | |
FORSYTH | 43 | 9.8 | 31 | 7.2 | 195 | 8.9 | |||
FRANKLIN | 4 | 5.2 | * | 8 | 10.6 | * | 25 | 6.9 | |
GASTON | 16 | 6.2 | 29 | 11.4 | 91 | 7.1 | |||
GATES | 1 | 10.3 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 4 | 8.0 | * |
GRAHAM | 0 | 0.0 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 1 | 2.4 | * |
GRANVILLE | 3 | 5.3 | * | 4 | 7.0 | * | 19 | 6.6 | |
GREENE | 3 | 13.3 | * | 1 | 4.8 | * | 11 | 10.5 | |
GUILFORD | 56 | 9.3 | 45 | 7.6 | 266 | 8.7 | |||
HALIFAX | 7 | 13.0 | * | 5 | 9.5 | * | 29 | 10.5 | |
HARNETT | 13 | 7.0 | 7 | 3.7 | * | 62 | 6.7 | ||
HAYWOOD | 5 | 9.5 | * | 4 | 7.7 | * | 19 | 6.7 | |
HENDERSON | 6 | 5.9 | * | 8 | 8.0 | * | 31 | 5.9 | |
HERTFORD | 0 | 0.0 | * | 4 | 19.2 | * | 13 | 12.0 | |
HOKE | 9 | 10.4 | * | 8 | 9.5 | * | 36 | 8.2 | |
HYDE | 0 | 0 | * | 0 | 0 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * |
IREDELL | 12 | 6.4 | 11 | 5.8 | 73 | 7.7 | |||
JACKSON | 1 | 2.7 | * | 2 | 6.3 | * | 12 | 6.6 | |
JOHNSTON | 16 | 6.3 | 13 | 5.2 | 73 | 6.1 | |||
JONES | 0 | 0.0 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 1 | 2.2 | * |
LEE | 4 | 5.1 | * | 8 | 10.1 | * | 33 | 8.4 | |
LENOIR | 6 | 9.7 | * | 7 | 10.5 | * | 28 | 8.8 | |
LINCOLN | 3 | 3.4 | * | 4 | 4.6 | * | 25 | 5.9 | |
MCDOWELL | 2 | 4.6 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 12 | 5.6 | |
MACON | 1 | 3.1 | * | 2 | 6.2 | * | 11 | 6.7 | |
MADISON | 1 | 5.5 | * | 1 | 5.6 | * | 4 | 4.2 | * |
MARTIN | 4 | 18.1 | * | 4 | 17.5 | * | 16 | 13.5 | |
MECKLENBURG | 90 | 6.3 | 75 | 5.1 | 415 | 5.7 | |||
MITCHELL | 1 | 7.9 | * | 1 | 6.8 | * | 3 | 4.3 | * |
MONTGOMERY | 2 | 7.2 | * | 3 | 11.1 | * | 14 | 10.1 | |
MOORE | 2 | 1.7 | * | 5 | 4.1 | * | 31 | 5.4 | |
NASH | 8 | 7.3 | * | 11 | 10.7 | 46 | 8.7 | ||
NEW HANOVER | 8 | 3.7 | * | 12 | 5.7 | 65 | 6.0 | ||
NORTHAMPTON | 1 | 6.1 | * | 3 | 17.2 | * | 9 | 9.9 | * |
ONSLOW | 15 | 3.9 | 19 | 5.1 | 97 | 5.0 | |||
ORANGE | 13 | 11.2 | 10 | 9.0 | 37 | 6.4 | |||
PAMLICO | 1 | 13.7 | * | 1 | 11.2 | * | 6 | 14.2 | * |
PASQUOTANK | 4 | 8.4 | * | 5 | 10.9 | * | 16 | 6.8 | |
PENDER | 2 | 3.2 | * | 2 | 3.4 | * | 20 | 6.3 | |
PERQUIMANS | 0 | 0.0 | * | 1 | 10.9 | * | 3 | 5.2 | * |
PERSON | 3 | 6.9 | * | 1 | 2.3 | * | 20 | 9.5 | |
PITT | 24 | 11.5 | 31 | 15.5 | 113 | 11.0 | |||
POLK | 0 | 0.0 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 2 | 2.8 | * |
RANDOLPH | 15 | 9.7 | 14 | 9.0 | 77 | 9.9 | |||
RICHMOND | 6 | 10.7 | * | 9 | 15.0 | * | 31 | 11.0 | |
ROBESON | 23 | 13.3 | 14 | 8.1 | 88 | 10.1 | |||
ROCKINGHAM | 8 | 9.0 | * | 4 | 4.3 | * | 37 | 8.2 | |
ROWAN | 14 | 9.0 | 6 | 3.8 | * | 58 | 7.3 | ||
RUTHERFORD | 1 | 1.5 | * | 5 | 8.0 | * | 22 | 6.6 | |
SAMPSON | 3 | 4.1 | * | 5 | 6.5 | * | 25 | 6.3 | |
SCOTLAND | 2 | 4.5 | * | 6 | 16.4 | * | 20 | 9.3 | |
STANLY | 6 | 9.0 | * | 3 | 4.7 | * | 29 | 8.5 | |
STOKES | 0 | 0.0 | * | 5 | 13.1 | * | 12 | 6.2 | |
SURRY | 5 | 6.5 | * | 2 | 2.6 | * | 19 | 5.1 | |
SWAIN | 5 | 27.6 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 9 | 11.4 | * |
TRANSYLVANIA | 3 | 11.5 | * | 2 | 8.8 | * | 9 | 7.0 | * |
TYRRELL | 0 | 0 | * | 0 | 0 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * |
UNION | 5 | 2.2 | * | 13 | 5.6 | 53 | 4.5 | ||
VANCE | 5 | 8.8 | * | 5 | 9.3 | * | 26 | 9.3 | |
WAKE | 74 | 5.8 | 69 | 5.5 | 353 | 5.6 | |||
WARREN | 1 | 6.9 | * | 4 | 22.5 | * | 7 | 8.4 | * |
WASHINGTON | 4 | 30.3 | * | 1 | 8.5 | * | 13 | 20.4 | |
WATAUGA | 1 | 3.2 | * | 0 | 0.0 | * | 14 | 8.1 | |
WAYNE | 17 | 10.5 | 14 | 9.1 | 66 | 8.2 | |||
WILKES | 8 | 12.0 | * | 2 | 2.9 | * | 24 | 7.1 | |
WILSON | 7 | 7.2 | * | 10 | 11.1 | 49 | 10.3 | ||
YADKIN | 5 | 13.3 | * | 5 | 13.8 | * | 15 | 8.0 | |
YANCEY | 0 | 0.0 | * | 1 | 5.5 | * | 2 | 2.3 | * |
*TECHNICAL NOTE: RATES BASED ON SMALL NUMBERS (FEWER THAN 10) ARE UNSTABLE |
Source: NC Department of Health & Human Services State Center for Health Statistics, 29NOV2021 |