| Back to Diabetes. |
Select a different topic for Buncombe County: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
| Total Respond.# |
Yes | Yes, during pregnancy | No | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 6,199 | 451 | 6.7 | 5.9- 7.7 | 55 | 0.8 | 0.6- 1.2 | 5,693 | 92.4 | 91.4-93.3 |
| Buncombe County | 424 | 31 | 7.1 | 4.9-10.3 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.4 | 391 | 92.5 | 89.4-94.8 |
| GENDER | ||||||||||
| Male | 166 | 11 | 6.8 | 3.8-12.0 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 155 | 93.2 | 88.0-96.2 |
| Female | 258 | 20 | 7.5 | 4.7-11.7 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.2- 2.8 | 236 | 91.9 | 87.5-94.8 |
| RACE | ||||||||||
| White | 378 | 24 | 6.2 | 4.1- 9.4 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.6 | 352 | 93.4 | 90.2-95.6 |
| Other | 42 | 6 | 12.6 | 5.4-26.7 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 36 | 87.4 | 73.3-94.6 |
| AGE | ||||||||||
| 18-44 | 181 | 4 | 2.5 | 0.9- 6.6 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.2- 2.9 | 175 | 96.8 | 92.8-98.6 |
| 45+ | 241 | 27 | 11.4 | 7.7-16.6 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 214 | 88.6 | 83.4-92.3 |
| EDUCATION | ||||||||||
| H.S. or Less | 175 | 14 | 6.4 | 3.7-10.9 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.2- 3.2 | 159 | 92.8 | 88.2-95.8 |
| Some College + | 247 | 17 | 7.8 | 4.7-12.5 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 230 | 92.2 | 87.5-95.3 |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | ||||||||||
| Less than $50,000 | 253 | 19 | 7.1 | 4.4-11.4 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.1- 2.6 | 233 | 92.5 | 88.2-95.3 |
| $50,000+ | 94 | 3 | 3.3 | 0.9-10.9 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 91 | 96.7 | 89.1-99.1 |
| COUNTY/REGION** | ||||||||||
| Cumberland | 429 | 41 | 7.7 | 5.4-10.9 | 5 | 1.2 | 0.5- 3.2 | 383 | 91.1 | 87.6-93.7 |
| Durham | 400 | 26 | 6.5 | 4.2-10.1 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.1 | 372 | 93.2 | 89.7-95.6 |
| Forsyth | 455 | 33 | 5.9 | 4.0- 8.6 | 5 | 0.8 | 0.3- 2.2 | 417 | 93.3 | 90.4-95.3 |
| Gaston | 467 | 42 | 7.9 | 5.8-10.9 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.5 | 423 | 91.7 | 88.7-93.9 |
| Guilford | 418 | 32 | 7.3 | 4.9-10.9 | 4 | 0.7 | 0.2- 2.0 | 382 | 92.0 | 88.4-94.5 |
| Mecklenburg | 430 | 24 | 4.9 | 3.2- 7.5 | 8 | 1.4 | 0.7- 2.8 | 398 | 93.7 | 90.9-95.6 |
| New Hanover | 405 | 20 | 5.0 | 3.1- 8.1 | 4 | 0.7 | 0.2- 1.9 | 381 | 94.3 | 91.2-96.4 |
| Onslow | 435 | 23 | 5.2 | 3.2- 8.2 | 5 | 1.6 | 0.5- 4.7 | 407 | 93.2 | 89.6-95.7 |
| Wake | 427 | 22 | 4.6 | 2.9- 7.2 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.7 | 404 | 95.3 | 92.7-97.0 |
| Western NC | 618 | 57 | 8.5 | 6.2-11.4 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.1- 1.0 | 559 | 91.3 | 88.3-93.6 |
| Piedmont NC | 670 | 45 | 5.7 | 4.0- 8.0 | 8 | 1.2 | 0.5- 2.6 | 617 | 93.2 | 90.7-95.0 |
| Eastern NC | 621 | 55 | 8.5 | 6.3-11.2 | 7 | 1.0 | 0.4- 2.0 | 559 | 90.6 | 87.7-92.8 |
#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.
** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore, Orange,
Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 13SEP02.
