| Back to Sexual Assault/Physical Violence. |
Select a different topic for Buncombe County: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
| Total Respond.# |
Yes, past 12 months | Yes, 12+ months ago | No | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 5,805 | 7 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.3 | 209 | 2.9 | 2.3- 3.5 | 5,589 | 97.0 | 96.4-97.6 |
| Buncombe County | 401 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.6 | 22 | 3.6 | 2.3- 5.6 | 377 | 96.0 | 93.9-97.4 |
| GENDER | ||||||||||
| Male | 154 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 4 | 1.7 | 0.6- 4.8 | 150 | 98.3 | 95.2-99.4 |
| Female | 247 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.2- 3.1 | 18 | 5.5 | 3.3- 8.9 | 227 | 93.8 | 90.2-96.1 |
| RACE | ||||||||||
| White | 358 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 1.8 | 22 | 4.2 | 2.7- 6.5 | 335 | 95.6 | 93.1-97.1 |
| Other | 40 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.2- 8.7 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 39 | 98.7 | 91.3-99.8 |
| AGE | ||||||||||
| 18-44 | 173 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.0- 2.5 | 10 | 3.2 | 1.6- 6.1 | 162 | 96.5 | 93.5-98.1 |
| 45+ | 227 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.1- 2.9 | 12 | 4.0 | 2.2- 7.3 | 214 | 95.6 | 92.2-97.5 |
| EDUCATION | ||||||||||
| H.S. or Less | 166 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 11 | 3.8 | 2.0- 7.1 | 155 | 96.2 | 92.9-98.0 |
| Some College + | 235 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.2- 2.7 | 11 | 3.5 | 1.8- 6.5 | 222 | 95.9 | 92.7-97.7 |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | ||||||||||
| Less than $50,000 | 241 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.2- 2.6 | 15 | 4.0 | 2.3- 6.9 | 224 | 95.4 | 92.3-97.2 |
| $50,000+ | 91 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 3 | 2.9 | 0.9- 8.7 | 88 | 97.1 | 91.3-99.1 |
| COUNTY/REGION** | ||||||||||
| Cumberland | 409 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 13 | 2.6 | 1.4- 4.5 | 396 | 97.4 | 95.5-98.6 |
| Durham | 374 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 10 | 1.5 | 0.7- 3.1 | 364 | 98.5 | 96.9-99.3 |
| Forsyth | 432 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 14 | 2.5 | 1.4- 4.3 | 418 | 97.5 | 95.7-98.6 |
| Gaston | 435 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 17 | 3.2 | 1.9- 5.3 | 418 | 96.8 | 94.7-98.1 |
| Guilford | 380 | 2 | 0.6 | 0.1- 2.9 | 15 | 3.0 | 1.7- 5.1 | 363 | 96.4 | 94.0-97.9 |
| Mecklenburg | 406 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 14 | 2.5 | 1.5- 4.3 | 392 | 97.5 | 95.7-98.5 |
| New Hanover | 377 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.2 | 10 | 1.9 | 0.9- 3.7 | 365 | 97.8 | 96.0-98.8 |
| Onslow | 412 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 16 | 3.2 | 1.9- 5.6 | 396 | 96.8 | 94.4-98.1 |
| Wake | 400 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 14 | 2.8 | 1.6- 4.9 | 386 | 97.2 | 95.1-98.4 |
| Western NC | 575 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 22 | 3.1 | 2.0- 4.7 | 553 | 96.9 | 95.3-98.0 |
| Piedmont NC | 629 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 13 | 1.7 | 0.9- 3.2 | 616 | 98.3 | 96.8-99.1 |
| Eastern NC | 575 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 1.8 | 29 | 4.5 | 2.9- 6.9 | 545 | 95.3 | 92.8-96.9 |
*If YES, the responded was asked 'Has this happened to you in the past 12 months?'
#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.
** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore, Orange,
Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 13SEP02.
