| Back to Sexual Assault/Physical Violence. |
Select a different topic for Cumberland County: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
| Total Respond.# |
Yes, past 12 months | Yes, 12+ months ago | No | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 5,804 | 15 | 0.2 | 0.1- 0.5 | 162 | 2.4 | 1.9- 3.1 | 5,627 | 97.3 | 96.7-97.9 |
| Cumberland County | 409 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.7 | 12 | 2.5 | 1.3- 4.5 | 396 | 97.4 | 95.4-98.6 |
| GENDER | ||||||||||
| Male | 164 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 2 | 0.9 | 0.2- 3.8 | 162 | 99.1 | 96.2-99.8 |
| Female | 245 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.6 | 10 | 4.4 | 2.3- 8.3 | 234 | 95.4 | 91.5-97.6 |
| RACE | ||||||||||
| White | 239 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 6 | 2.6 | 1.1- 6.0 | 233 | 97.4 | 94.0-98.9 |
| Other | 158 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.7 | 6 | 2.5 | 1.0- 5.9 | 151 | 97.3 | 93.9-98.8 |
| AGE | ||||||||||
| 18-44 | 232 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 6 | 1.9 | 0.8- 4.5 | 226 | 98.1 | 95.5-99.2 |
| 45+ | 175 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 2.2 | 6 | 3.6 | 1.5- 8.3 | 168 | 96.1 | 91.4-98.2 |
| EDUCATION | ||||||||||
| H.S. or Less | 173 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.6 | 9 | 3.9 | 1.9- 8.0 | 163 | 95.9 | 91.8-98.0 |
| Some College + | 235 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 3 | 1.2 | 0.4- 4.2 | 232 | 98.8 | 95.8-99.6 |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | ||||||||||
| Less than $50,000 | 248 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.3 | 10 | 3.5 | 1.8- 6.6 | 237 | 96.3 | 93.2-98.1 |
| $50,000+ | 82 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 1 | 1.4 | 0.2- 9.3 | 81 | 98.6 | 90.7-99.8 |
| COUNTY/REGION** | ||||||||||
| Buncombe | 401 | 2 | 2.0 | 0.5- 7.4 | 15 | 3.1 | 1.7- 5.5 | 384 | 95.0 | 90.7-97.4 |
| Durham | 374 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.5 | 9 | 1.6 | 0.7- 3.4 | 364 | 98.2 | 96.4-99.1 |
| Forsyth | 432 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.1- 2.2 | 10 | 1.9 | 1.0- 3.6 | 420 | 97.6 | 95.6-98.7 |
| Gaston | 435 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.9 | 14 | 3.5 | 2.0- 6.0 | 419 | 96.1 | 93.5-97.7 |
| Guilford | 380 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 11 | 1.9 | 1.0- 3.5 | 369 | 98.1 | 96.5-99.0 |
| Mecklenburg | 404 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 2.2 | 6 | 1.3 | 0.5- 3.0 | 397 | 98.4 | 96.5-99.3 |
| New Hanover | 377 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.5 | 9 | 1.7 | 0.8- 3.6 | 366 | 97.9 | 96.0-98.9 |
| Onslow | 412 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.9 | 16 | 3.2 | 1.8- 5.6 | 395 | 96.6 | 94.2-98.1 |
| Wake | 401 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 13 | 3.1 | 1.7- 5.7 | 388 | 96.9 | 94.3-98.3 |
| Western NC | 577 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.1- 2.5 | 10 | 1.5 | 0.8- 2.8 | 566 | 98.2 | 96.5-99.1 |
| Piedmont NC | 629 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 19 | 2.6 | 1.6- 4.3 | 610 | 97.4 | 95.7-98.4 |
| Eastern NC | 573 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.6 | 18 | 3.0 | 1.7- 5.2 | 553 | 96.6 | 94.4-98.0 |
*If YES, the responded was asked 'Has this happened to you in the past 12 months?'
#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.
** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore, Orange,
Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 13SEP02.
