Back to Sexual Assault/Physical Violence. |
Select a different topic for Cumberland County: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
Total Respond.# |
Yes, past 12 months | Yes, 12+ months ago | No | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
North Carolina | 5,805 | 7 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.3 | 209 | 2.9 | 2.3- 3.5 | 5,589 | 97.0 | 96.4-97.6 |
Cumberland County | 409 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 13 | 2.6 | 1.4- 4.5 | 396 | 97.4 | 95.5-98.6 |
GENDER | ||||||||||
Male | 164 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 1 | 0.5 | 0.1- 3.5 | 163 | 99.5 | 96.5-99.9 |
Female | 245 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 12 | 5.0 | 2.8- 9.0 | 233 | 95.0 | 91.0-97.2 |
RACE | ||||||||||
White | 239 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 6 | 2.6 | 1.1- 5.7 | 233 | 97.4 | 94.3-98.9 |
Other | 158 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 7 | 2.6 | 1.1- 6.0 | 151 | 97.4 | 94.0-98.9 |
AGE | ||||||||||
18-44 | 232 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 6 | 2.0 | 0.8- 4.5 | 226 | 98.0 | 95.5-99.2 |
45+ | 175 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 7 | 3.8 | 1.7- 8.1 | 168 | 96.2 | 91.9-98.3 |
EDUCATION | ||||||||||
H.S. or Less | 173 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 7 | 3.0 | 1.3- 6.7 | 166 | 97.0 | 93.3-98.7 |
Some College + | 235 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 6 | 2.2 | 0.9- 4.9 | 229 | 97.8 | 95.1-99.1 |
HOUSEHOLD INCOME | ||||||||||
Less than $50,000 | 248 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 9 | 3.1 | 1.5- 6.0 | 239 | 96.9 | 94.0-98.5 |
$50,000+ | 82 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 2 | 2.4 | 0.6- 9.3 | 80 | 97.6 | 90.7-99.4 |
COUNTY/REGION** | ||||||||||
Buncombe | 401 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.6 | 22 | 3.6 | 2.3- 5.6 | 377 | 96.0 | 93.9-97.4 |
Durham | 374 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 10 | 1.5 | 0.7- 3.1 | 364 | 98.5 | 96.9-99.3 |
Forsyth | 432 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 14 | 2.5 | 1.4- 4.3 | 418 | 97.5 | 95.7-98.6 |
Gaston | 435 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 17 | 3.2 | 1.9- 5.3 | 418 | 96.8 | 94.7-98.1 |
Guilford | 380 | 2 | 0.6 | 0.1- 2.9 | 15 | 3.0 | 1.7- 5.1 | 363 | 96.4 | 94.0-97.9 |
Mecklenburg | 406 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 14 | 2.5 | 1.5- 4.3 | 392 | 97.5 | 95.7-98.5 |
New Hanover | 377 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.2 | 10 | 1.9 | 0.9- 3.7 | 365 | 97.8 | 96.0-98.8 |
Onslow | 412 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 16 | 3.2 | 1.9- 5.6 | 396 | 96.8 | 94.4-98.1 |
Wake | 400 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 14 | 2.8 | 1.6- 4.9 | 386 | 97.2 | 95.1-98.4 |
Western NC | 575 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 22 | 3.1 | 2.0- 4.7 | 553 | 96.9 | 95.3-98.0 |
Piedmont NC | 629 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 13 | 1.7 | 0.9- 3.2 | 616 | 98.3 | 96.8-99.1 |
Eastern NC | 575 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 1.8 | 29 | 4.5 | 2.9- 6.9 | 545 | 95.3 | 92.8-96.9 |
*If YES, the responded was asked 'Has this happened to you in the past 12 months?'
#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.
** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore, Orange,
Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 13SEP02.