SCHS Home Search FAQs Guestbook

North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics Navigation Bar

BRFSS Survey Results 2001 for Cumberland County

HIV/AIDS

How effective do you think these treatments are helping persons with HIV to live longer?
Would you say:*

Back to HIV/AIDS. Select a different topic for Cumberland County:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.#
Very effective Somewhat Effective Not at all effective Don't know/Not sure
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 4,355 1,048 23.3 21.3-25.4 2,597 59.3 57.0-61.6 74 2.0 1.4- 2.8 636 15.5 13.8-17.2
Cumberland County 308 73 21.4 16.9-26.8 180 58.8 52.1-65.3 3 1.1 0.3- 3.6 52 18.7 13.6-25.1
GENDER
Male 134 30 21.7 15.3-29.9 81 58.9 48.6-68.4 2 1.6 0.4- 6.4 21 17.8 10.6-28.2
Female 174 43 21.0 15.3-28.1 99 58.8 50.5-66.6 1 0.4 0.1- 2.5 31 19.8 13.9-27.4
RACE
White 177 36 17.8 12.6-24.5 113 63.1 54.0-71.5 1 0.7 0.1- 4.7 27 18.4 11.7-27.7
Other 124 35 25.6 17.9-35.3 63 53.0 42.5-63.2 2 1.6 0.3- 7.4 24 19.8 12.9-29.1
AGE
18-44 217 48 20.5 15.4-26.9 127 57.7 49.6-65.4 3 1.4 0.4- 4.7 39 20.4 14.2-28.4
45+ 91 25 24.2 15.7-35.2 53 62.5 50.9-72.9 0 0.0 . - . 13 13.3 7.3-22.9
EDUCATION
H.S. or Less 120 26 18.1 11.9-26.5 64 53.2 42.2-63.9 3 2.6 0.8- 8.7 27 26.0 16.9-37.9
Some College + 188 47 23.6 17.5-31.2 116 62.6 54.5-70.1 0 0.0 . - . 25 13.7 9.0-20.3
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $50,000 187 39 17.6 12.5-24.2 113 60.2 51.3-68.6 0 0.0 . - . 35 22.2 15.1-31.4
$50,000+ 75 20 26.1 16.4-38.9 46 61.6 47.8-73.7 0 0.0 . - . 9 12.3 6.1-23.4
COUNTY/REGION**
Buncombe 306 71 21.8 17.1-27.5 192 64.8 58.5-70.6 4 1.7 0.6- 4.9 39 11.6 8.3-16.1
Durham 295 106 34.6 27.3-42.7 154 51.1 43.1-59.0 5 1.9 0.7- 4.7 30 12.5 7.1-21.0
Forsyth 305 73 22.9 18.0-28.7 193 65.1 58.7-71.0 5 1.2 0.4- 3.3 34 10.8 7.5-15.2
Gaston 301 63 20.1 15.6-25.5 180 62.1 55.8-68.0 7 2.2 0.9- 5.4 51 15.6 11.6-20.7
Guilford 298 73 22.6 17.9-28.2 180 59.9 53.4-66.1 2 0.5 0.1- 2.8 43 16.9 12.3-22.7
Mecklenburg 324 95 29.8 24.5-35.8 193 59.6 53.5-65.5 5 1.6 0.5- 4.7 31 8.9 6.1-12.9
New Hanover 297 70 23.6 18.5-29.6 184 60.0 53.4-66.3 4 2.4 0.9- 6.4 39 13.9 9.7-19.6
Onslow 336 65 20.2 13.5-29.1 207 62.6 54.4-70.2 12 3.6 2.0- 6.5 52 13.6 10.0-18.2
Wake 341 92 26.2 21.2-31.9 203 59.3 53.2-65.2 2 1.3 0.2- 6.5 44 13.2 9.5-18.0
Western NC 386 63 15.5 11.9-19.8 255 67.6 62.2-72.5 6 1.7 0.7- 4.2 62 15.2 11.7-19.6
Piedmont NC 454 104 22.3 17.3-28.2 252 57.3 51.1-63.2 7 1.4 0.6- 3.3 91 19.1 15.1-23.8
Eastern NC 404 100 24.2 19.4-29.8 224 56.6 50.6-62.5 12 3.6 1.9- 6.9 68 15.5 11.6-20.3

Back to HIV/AIDS.

* This question was asked only if the respondent (< 65 yrs.) and who believed medical treatments were available for HIV.

#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.

** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 13SEP02.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook