SCHS Home Search FAQs Guestbook

North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics Navigation Bar

BRFSS Survey Results 2001 for Guilford County

HIV/AIDS

How effective do you think these treatments are helping persons with HIV to live longer?
Would you say:*

Back to HIV/AIDS. Select a different topic for Guilford County:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.#
Very effective Somewhat Effective Not at all effective Don't know/Not sure
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 4,355 1,048 23.3 21.3-25.4 2,597 59.3 57.0-61.6 74 2.0 1.4- 2.8 636 15.5 13.8-17.2
Guilford County 298 73 22.6 17.9-28.2 180 59.9 53.4-66.1 2 0.5 0.1- 2.8 43 16.9 12.3-22.7
GENDER
Male 106 23 20.5 13.6-29.8 70 66.7 56.3-75.6 0 0.0 . - . 13 12.8 7.4-21.4
Female 192 50 24.5 18.5-31.6 110 54.1 46.0-62.0 2 1.0 0.2- 5.1 30 20.5 14.0-28.8
RACE
White 201 51 24.8 18.8-31.9 119 56.8 48.9-64.4 2 0.8 0.1- 4.3 29 17.6 11.9-25.1
Other 95 22 19.4 12.3-29.1 60 65.2 53.7-75.2 0 0.0 . - . 13 15.4 8.7-25.7
AGE
18-44 179 42 22.3 16.4-29.7 110 62.4 54.1-69.9 0 0.0 . - . 27 15.3 10.3-22.0
45+ 119 31 23.1 15.9-32.3 70 55.9 45.3-66.1 2 1.4 0.2- 7.1 16 19.6 11.7-31.0
EDUCATION
H.S. or Less 86 14 16.2 9.2-26.7 58 66.1 53.4-76.9 0 0.0 . - . 14 17.7 9.6-30.4
Some College + 212 59 25.6 19.8-32.5 122 57.1 49.4-64.4 2 0.8 0.1- 4.0 29 16.5 11.5-23.2
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $50,000 157 37 20.2 14.2-27.8 98 65.1 56.2-73.1 0 0.0 . - . 22 14.7 9.5-22.2
$50,000+ 101 25 24.2 16.5-34.0 62 58.0 47.4-67.8 1 1.3 0.2- 8.8 13 16.5 9.8-26.4
COUNTY/REGION**
Buncombe 306 71 21.8 17.1-27.5 192 64.8 58.5-70.6 4 1.7 0.6- 4.9 39 11.6 8.3-16.1
Cumberland 308 73 21.4 16.9-26.8 180 58.8 52.1-65.3 3 1.1 0.3- 3.6 52 18.7 13.6-25.1
Durham 295 106 34.6 27.3-42.7 154 51.1 43.1-59.0 5 1.9 0.7- 4.7 30 12.5 7.1-21.0
Forsyth 305 73 22.9 18.0-28.7 193 65.1 58.7-71.0 5 1.2 0.4- 3.3 34 10.8 7.5-15.2
Gaston 301 63 20.1 15.6-25.5 180 62.1 55.8-68.0 7 2.2 0.9- 5.4 51 15.6 11.6-20.7
Mecklenburg 324 95 29.8 24.5-35.8 193 59.6 53.5-65.5 5 1.6 0.5- 4.7 31 8.9 6.1-12.9
New Hanover 297 70 23.6 18.5-29.6 184 60.0 53.4-66.3 4 2.4 0.9- 6.4 39 13.9 9.7-19.6
Onslow 336 65 20.2 13.5-29.1 207 62.6 54.4-70.2 12 3.6 2.0- 6.5 52 13.6 10.0-18.2
Wake 341 92 26.2 21.2-31.9 203 59.3 53.2-65.2 2 1.3 0.2- 6.5 44 13.2 9.5-18.0
Western NC 386 63 15.5 11.9-19.8 255 67.6 62.2-72.5 6 1.7 0.7- 4.2 62 15.2 11.7-19.6
Piedmont NC 454 104 22.3 17.3-28.2 252 57.3 51.1-63.2 7 1.4 0.6- 3.3 91 19.1 15.1-23.8
Eastern NC 404 100 24.2 19.4-29.8 224 56.6 50.6-62.5 12 3.6 1.9- 6.9 68 15.5 11.6-20.3

Back to HIV/AIDS.

* This question was asked only if the respondent (< 65 yrs.) and who believed medical treatments were available for HIV.

#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.

** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 13SEP02.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook