SCHS Home Search FAQs Guestbook

North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics Navigation Bar

BRFSS Survey Results 2001 for New Hanover County

HIV/AIDS

How effective do you think these treatments are helping persons with HIV to live longer?
Would you say:*

Back to HIV/AIDS. Select a different topic for New Hanover County:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.#
Very effective Somewhat Effective Not at all effective Don't know/Not sure
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 4,355 1,048 23.3 21.3-25.4 2,597 59.3 57.0-61.6 74 2.0 1.4- 2.8 636 15.5 13.8-17.2
New Hanover County 297 70 23.6 18.5-29.6 184 60.0 53.4-66.3 4 2.4 0.9- 6.4 39 13.9 9.7-19.6
GENDER
Male 124 27 21.4 14.6-30.3 79 60.9 50.9-70.1 2 2.1 0.5- 8.2 16 15.6 9.3-25.0
Female 173 43 26.2 19.3-34.4 105 59.0 50.4-67.1 2 2.8 0.7-10.9 23 12.1 7.6-18.8
RACE
White 257 63 24.9 19.4-31.3 157 60.6 53.6-67.1 2 1.3 0.3- 5.2 35 13.2 9.1-18.7
Other 38 6 15.2 5.5-35.5 26 58.0 38.1-75.5 2 8.3 2.0-28.7 4 18.5 6.6-42.3
AGE
18-44 171 32 19.4 13.4-27.3 110 60.4 51.4-68.7 3 3.1 1.0- 9.5 26 17.1 11.1-25.4
45+ 126 38 30.5 22.3-40.0 74 59.4 49.7-68.5 1 1.3 0.2- 8.4 13 8.9 4.9-15.6
EDUCATION
H.S. or Less 80 19 25.5 15.8-38.4 45 49.7 37.4-62.1 3 5.8 1.8-17.1 13 19.0 10.3-32.4
Some College + 215 51 23.0 17.4-29.7 137 64.3 56.7-71.2 1 0.9 0.1- 6.4 26 11.8 7.6-17.9
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $50,000 148 34 22.7 15.9-31.3 96 63.0 53.3-71.7 1 1.0 0.1- 6.5 17 13.4 7.6-22.6
$50,000+ 117 30 24.9 17.4-34.2 70 59.4 49.2-68.8 1 1.7 0.2-10.8 16 14.1 8.2-23.2
COUNTY/REGION**
Buncombe 306 71 21.8 17.1-27.5 192 64.8 58.5-70.6 4 1.7 0.6- 4.9 39 11.6 8.3-16.1
Cumberland 308 73 21.4 16.9-26.8 180 58.8 52.1-65.3 3 1.1 0.3- 3.6 52 18.7 13.6-25.1
Durham 295 106 34.6 27.3-42.7 154 51.1 43.1-59.0 5 1.9 0.7- 4.7 30 12.5 7.1-21.0
Forsyth 305 73 22.9 18.0-28.7 193 65.1 58.7-71.0 5 1.2 0.4- 3.3 34 10.8 7.5-15.2
Gaston 301 63 20.1 15.6-25.5 180 62.1 55.8-68.0 7 2.2 0.9- 5.4 51 15.6 11.6-20.7
Guilford 298 73 22.6 17.9-28.2 180 59.9 53.4-66.1 2 0.5 0.1- 2.8 43 16.9 12.3-22.7
Mecklenburg 324 95 29.8 24.5-35.8 193 59.6 53.5-65.5 5 1.6 0.5- 4.7 31 8.9 6.1-12.9
Onslow 336 65 20.2 13.5-29.1 207 62.6 54.4-70.2 12 3.6 2.0- 6.5 52 13.6 10.0-18.2
Wake 341 92 26.2 21.2-31.9 203 59.3 53.2-65.2 2 1.3 0.2- 6.5 44 13.2 9.5-18.0
Western NC 386 63 15.5 11.9-19.8 255 67.6 62.2-72.5 6 1.7 0.7- 4.2 62 15.2 11.7-19.6
Piedmont NC 454 104 22.3 17.3-28.2 252 57.3 51.1-63.2 7 1.4 0.6- 3.3 91 19.1 15.1-23.8
Eastern NC 404 100 24.2 19.4-29.8 224 56.6 50.6-62.5 12 3.6 1.9- 6.9 68 15.5 11.6-20.3

Back to HIV/AIDS.

* This question was asked only if the respondent (< 65 yrs.) and who believed medical treatments were available for HIV.

#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.

** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 13SEP02.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook