SCHS Home Search FAQs Guestbook

North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics Navigation Bar

BRFSS Survey Results 2001 for Onslow County

HIV/AIDS

How effective do you think these treatments are helping persons with HIV to live longer?
Would you say:*

Back to HIV/AIDS. Select a different topic for Onslow County:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.#
Very effective Somewhat Effective Not at all effective Don't know/Not sure
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 4,355 1,048 23.3 21.3-25.4 2,597 59.3 57.0-61.6 74 2.0 1.4- 2.8 636 15.5 13.8-17.2
Onslow County 336 65 20.2 13.5-29.1 207 62.6 54.4-70.2 12 3.6 2.0- 6.5 52 13.6 10.0-18.2
GENDER
Male 134 20 18.6 8.6-35.6 81 63.5 49.6-75.5 5 2.9 1.2- 7.3 28 14.9 9.6-22.6
Female 202 45 22.1 16.5-29.0 126 61.6 53.9-68.7 7 4.4 2.1- 9.2 24 11.9 7.9-17.7
RACE
White 260 41 18.5 10.6-30.2 167 63.2 53.2-72.1 7 2.5 1.2- 5.3 45 15.8 11.3-21.7
Other 68 21 24.5 14.6-38.1 36 61.7 46.3-75.1 5 7.7 3.0-18.3 6 6.1 2.5-14.4
AGE
18-44 236 48 22.1 13.7-33.7 139 59.2 48.8-68.8 9 3.9 2.0- 7.6 40 14.8 10.3-20.7
45+ 100 17 14.5 8.3-24.0 68 72.7 62.0-81.2 3 2.7 0.9- 8.3 12 10.1 5.4-18.1
EDUCATION
H.S. or Less 147 27 15.6 10.2-23.0 85 61.4 51.7-70.3 5 3.7 1.5- 8.8 30 19.3 13.1-27.5
Some College + 189 38 23.9 13.4-38.7 122 63.6 50.6-74.9 7 3.6 1.6- 7.6 22 8.9 5.5-14.2
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $50,000 212 39 20.4 11.4-33.8 130 60.6 49.3-70.9 11 5.2 2.8- 9.6 32 13.8 9.3-20.1
$50,000+ 82 16 19.8 11.9-31.0 58 72.1 60.4-81.4 1 1.0 0.1- 6.9 7 7.1 3.3-14.7
COUNTY/REGION**
Buncombe 306 71 21.8 17.1-27.5 192 64.8 58.5-70.6 4 1.7 0.6- 4.9 39 11.6 8.3-16.1
Cumberland 308 73 21.4 16.9-26.8 180 58.8 52.1-65.3 3 1.1 0.3- 3.6 52 18.7 13.6-25.1
Durham 295 106 34.6 27.3-42.7 154 51.1 43.1-59.0 5 1.9 0.7- 4.7 30 12.5 7.1-21.0
Forsyth 305 73 22.9 18.0-28.7 193 65.1 58.7-71.0 5 1.2 0.4- 3.3 34 10.8 7.5-15.2
Gaston 301 63 20.1 15.6-25.5 180 62.1 55.8-68.0 7 2.2 0.9- 5.4 51 15.6 11.6-20.7
Guilford 298 73 22.6 17.9-28.2 180 59.9 53.4-66.1 2 0.5 0.1- 2.8 43 16.9 12.3-22.7
Mecklenburg 324 95 29.8 24.5-35.8 193 59.6 53.5-65.5 5 1.6 0.5- 4.7 31 8.9 6.1-12.9
New Hanover 297 70 23.6 18.5-29.6 184 60.0 53.4-66.3 4 2.4 0.9- 6.4 39 13.9 9.7-19.6
Wake 341 92 26.2 21.2-31.9 203 59.3 53.2-65.2 2 1.3 0.2- 6.5 44 13.2 9.5-18.0
Western NC 386 63 15.5 11.9-19.8 255 67.6 62.2-72.5 6 1.7 0.7- 4.2 62 15.2 11.7-19.6
Piedmont NC 454 104 22.3 17.3-28.2 252 57.3 51.1-63.2 7 1.4 0.6- 3.3 91 19.1 15.1-23.8
Eastern NC 404 100 24.2 19.4-29.8 224 56.6 50.6-62.5 12 3.6 1.9- 6.9 68 15.5 11.6-20.3

Back to HIV/AIDS.

* This question was asked only if the respondent (< 65 yrs.) and who believed medical treatments were available for HIV.

#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.

** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 13SEP02.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook