SCHS Home Search FAQs Guestbook

North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics Navigation Bar

BRFSS Survey Results 2001 for Wake County

HIV/AIDS

How effective do you think these treatments are helping persons with HIV to live longer?
Would you say:*

Back to HIV/AIDS. Select a different topic for Wake County:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.#
Very effective Somewhat Effective Not at all effective Don't know/Not sure
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 4,355 1,048 23.3 21.3-25.4 2,597 59.3 57.0-61.6 74 2.0 1.4- 2.8 636 15.5 13.8-17.2
Wake County 341 92 26.2 21.2-31.9 203 59.3 53.2-65.2 2 1.3 0.2- 6.5 44 13.2 9.5-18.0
GENDER
Male 156 38 25.6 18.7-33.9 96 59.4 50.5-67.8 2 2.3 0.4-11.2 20 12.8 7.9-19.8
Female 185 54 27.1 20.5-34.8 107 59.1 50.8-67.0 0 0.0 . - . 24 13.8 8.8-21.0
RACE
White 259 73 26.7 21.2-33.0 157 62.9 56.2-69.2 1 0.3 0.0- 1.8 28 10.1 6.8-14.8
Other 77 18 24.9 15.0-38.3 43 49.3 36.4-62.3 1 4.0 0.6-23.1 15 21.9 12.7-35.0
AGE
18-44 244 63 24.8 19.2-31.5 144 59.2 51.8-66.1 2 1.7 0.3- 8.6 35 14.3 9.9-20.3
45+ 97 29 30.3 20.9-41.6 59 59.7 48.4-70.2 0 0.0 . - . 9 10.0 5.1-18.8
EDUCATION
H.S. or Less 78 12 16.9 9.0-29.4 53 65.0 51.5-76.5 2 4.8 0.9-21.8 11 13.4 7.1-23.7
Some College + 261 80 29.7 23.9-36.3 149 57.3 50.3-64.0 0 0.0 . - . 32 13.0 8.8-18.8
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $50,000 139 36 24.0 16.7-33.1 83 59.3 49.2-68.7 2 3.3 0.6-16.0 18 13.4 7.9-21.7
$50,000+ 149 42 26.7 19.8-35.0 91 62.0 53.1-70.1 0 0.0 . - . 16 11.3 6.6-18.8
COUNTY/REGION**
Buncombe 306 71 21.8 17.1-27.5 192 64.8 58.5-70.6 4 1.7 0.6- 4.9 39 11.6 8.3-16.1
Cumberland 308 73 21.4 16.9-26.8 180 58.8 52.1-65.3 3 1.1 0.3- 3.6 52 18.7 13.6-25.1
Durham 295 106 34.6 27.3-42.7 154 51.1 43.1-59.0 5 1.9 0.7- 4.7 30 12.5 7.1-21.0
Forsyth 305 73 22.9 18.0-28.7 193 65.1 58.7-71.0 5 1.2 0.4- 3.3 34 10.8 7.5-15.2
Gaston 301 63 20.1 15.6-25.5 180 62.1 55.8-68.0 7 2.2 0.9- 5.4 51 15.6 11.6-20.7
Guilford 298 73 22.6 17.9-28.2 180 59.9 53.4-66.1 2 0.5 0.1- 2.8 43 16.9 12.3-22.7
Mecklenburg 324 95 29.8 24.5-35.8 193 59.6 53.5-65.5 5 1.6 0.5- 4.7 31 8.9 6.1-12.9
New Hanover 297 70 23.6 18.5-29.6 184 60.0 53.4-66.3 4 2.4 0.9- 6.4 39 13.9 9.7-19.6
Onslow 336 65 20.2 13.5-29.1 207 62.6 54.4-70.2 12 3.6 2.0- 6.5 52 13.6 10.0-18.2
Western NC 386 63 15.5 11.9-19.8 255 67.6 62.2-72.5 6 1.7 0.7- 4.2 62 15.2 11.7-19.6
Piedmont NC 454 104 22.3 17.3-28.2 252 57.3 51.1-63.2 7 1.4 0.6- 3.3 91 19.1 15.1-23.8
Eastern NC 404 100 24.2 19.4-29.8 224 56.6 50.6-62.5 12 3.6 1.9- 6.9 68 15.5 11.6-20.3

Back to HIV/AIDS.

* This question was asked only if the respondent (< 65 yrs.) and who believed medical treatments were available for HIV.

#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.

** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, Northampton, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 16SEP02.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook