|
Select a different topic for Buncombe County: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
| Total Respond.# |
Yes | Yes, during pregnancy | No | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 6,740 | 528 | 7.2 | 6.4- 8.1 | 55 | 0.9 | 0.6- 1.3 | 6,157 | 91.9 | 91.0-92.8 |
| Buncombe County | 414 | 19 | 4.8 | 2.9- 7.7 | 5 | 1.1 | 0.4- 2.8 | 390 | 94.1 | 91.0-96.2 |
| GENDER | ||||||||||
| Male | 160 | 9 | 5.8 | 2.9-11.3 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 151 | 94.2 | 88.7-97.1 |
| Female | 254 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.9- 7.4 | 5 | 2.2 | 0.9- 5.3 | 239 | 94.0 | 89.9-96.5 |
| RACE | ||||||||||
| White | 366 | 12 | 3.5 | 1.9- 6.4 | 4 | 1.0 | 0.4- 2.8 | 350 | 95.5 | 92.4-97.4 |
| Other | 41 | 7 | 16.0 | 7.1-32.1 | 1 | 2.0 | 0.3-13.1 | 33 | 82.0 | 65.9-91.5 |
| AGE | ||||||||||
| 18-44 | 152 | 2 | 1.0 | 0.3- 3.9 | 3 | 1.6 | 0.5- 4.8 | 147 | 97.4 | 93.9-98.9 |
| 45+ | 256 | 17 | 8.0 | 4.8-13.1 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.2- 3.5 | 237 | 91.2 | 86.1-94.6 |
| EDUCATION | ||||||||||
| H.S. or Less | 158 | 8 | 4.5 | 2.1- 9.4 | 3 | 1.8 | 0.5- 5.8 | 147 | 93.7 | 88.4-96.7 |
| Some College + | 252 | 11 | 5.0 | 2.6- 9.4 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.2- 2.7 | 239 | 94.3 | 89.9-96.8 |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | ||||||||||
| Less than $50,000 | 216 | 14 | 7.2 | 4.1-12.5 | 4 | 1.8 | 0.7- 5.1 | 198 | 90.9 | 85.4-94.5 |
| $50,000+ | 89 | 1 | 2.0 | 0.3-13.0 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.1- 5.7 | 87 | 97.1 | 88.1-99.4 |
| COUNTY/REGION** | ||||||||||
| Forsyth | 465 | 30 | 5.7 | 3.9- 8.3 | 8 | 1.7 | 0.8- 3.8 | 427 | 92.5 | 89.6-94.7 |
| Guilford | 424 | 34 | 6.2 | 4.2- 8.9 | 4 | 0.8 | 0.3- 2.5 | 386 | 93.0 | 90.1-95.1 |
| Henderson/Transylvania | 474 | 30 | 5.4 | 3.4- 8.5 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 444 | 94.6 | 91.5-96.6 |
| Mecklenburg | 447 | 29 | 3.8 | 2.6- 5.6 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.7 | 416 | 95.8 | 93.8-97.1 |
| Orange | 441 | 17 | 3.0 | 1.7- 5.1 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.2 | 422 | 96.7 | 94.6-98.1 |
| Pitt | 419 | 37 | 7.4 | 5.0-10.7 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.7 | 381 | 92.5 | 89.2-94.9 |
| Randolph | 432 | 35 | 8.4 | 5.6-12.3 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.1- 5.3 | 396 | 90.8 | 86.6-93.8 |
| Robeson | 445 | 46 | 7.9 | 5.6-10.9 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.0- 0.9 | 397 | 91.9 | 88.9-94.2 |
| Wake | 431 | 24 | 4.5 | 2.8- 6.9 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.2- 1.5 | 403 | 95.0 | 92.5-96.7 |
| Western NC | 658 | 63 | 9.2 | 6.9-12.0 | 3 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.3 | 592 | 90.5 | 87.6-92.8 |
| Piedmont NC | 888 | 78 | 8.0 | 6.2-10.3 | 13 | 1.5 | 0.8- 2.6 | 797 | 90.5 | 88.1-92.5 |
| Eastern NC | 802 | 86 | 8.3 | 6.5-10.5 | 10 | 0.8 | 0.4- 1.7 | 706 | 90.9 | 88.6-92.8 |
#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.
** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore,
Person, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 14JUL03.
