|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
| Total Respond.# |
None | At least once | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| TOTAL | 1,046 | 1,037 | 99.2 | 98.4-99.6 | 9 | 0.8 | 0.4- 1.6 |
| GENDER | |||||||
| Male | 368 | 362 | 98.7 | 96.8-99.4 | 6 | 1.3 | 0.6- 3.2 |
| Female | 678 | 675 | 99.6 | 98.6-99.9 | 3 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.4 |
| AGE | |||||||
| 18-24 | 92 | 89 | 98.7 | 95.2-99.7 | 3 | 1.3 | 0.3- 4.8 |
| 25-34 | 190 | 186 | 98.2 | 94.9-99.3 | 4 | 1.8 | 0.7- 5.1 |
| 35-44 | 237 | 236 | 99.4 | 96.2-99.9 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.1- 3.8 |
| 45-54 | 217 | 216 | 99.3 | 95.5-99.9 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.1- 4.5 |
| 55-64 | 128 | 128 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| 65-74 | 95 | 95 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| 75+ | 68 | 68 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 201 | 201 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 353 | 349 | 99.1 | 97.2-99.7 | 4 | 0.9 | 0.3- 2.8 |
| Some Post-H.S. | 279 | 275 | 98.8 | 96.5-99.6 | 4 | 1.2 | 0.4- 3.5 |
| College Graduate | 205 | 204 | 99.2 | 94.7-99.9 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.1- 5.3 |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 147 | 147 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| $15,000- 24,999 | 236 | 236 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| $25,000- 34,999 | 162 | 160 | 98.6 | 94.5-99.7 | 2 | 1.4 | 0.3- 5.5 |
| $35,000- 49,999 | 125 | 123 | 98.6 | 93.9-99.7 | 2 | 1.4 | 0.3- 6.1 |
| $50,000-74,999 | 62 | 61 | 98.2 | 87.8-99.7 | 1 | 1.8 | 0.3-12.2 |
| $75,000+ | 59 | 59 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| COUNTY/REGION** | |||||||
| Buncombe | 27 | 27 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Forsyth | 96 | 94 | 97.7 | 91.1-99.4 | 2 | 2.3 | 0.6- 8.9 |
| Guilford | 117 | 116 | 99.4 | 96.1-99.9 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.1- 3.9 |
| Henderson/Transylvania | 12 | 12 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Mecklenburg | 133 | 130 | 97.5 | 92.4-99.2 | 3 | 2.5 | 0.8- 7.6 |
| Orange | 42 | 42 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Pitt | 111 | 111 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Randolph | 16 | 16 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Robeson | 92 | 92 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Wake | 74 | 74 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Western NC | 23 | 21 | 87.2 | 60.3-96.8 | 2 | 12.8 | 3.2-39.7 |
| Piedmont NC | 113 | 113 | 100 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Eastern NC | 190 | 189 | 99.6 | 97.4-99.9 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.1- 2.6 |
* This question was asked only of respondents who reported drinking at least one drink in the last month.
#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.
** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore,
Person, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 28JUL03.