|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
| Total Respond.# |
Yes | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| TOTAL | 3,378 | 32 | 0.7 | 0.5- 1.2 | 3,346 | 99.3 | 98.8-99.5 |
| GENDER | |||||||
| Male | 1,280 | 18 | 1.0 | 0.5- 1.9 | 1,262 | 99.0 | 98.1-99.5 |
| Female | 2,098 | 14 | 0.5 | 0.2- 1.0 | 2,084 | 99.5 | 99.0-99.8 |
| AGE | |||||||
| 40-44 | 471 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 1.9 | 470 | 99.7 | 98.1- 100 |
| 45-54 | 989 | 4 | 0.3 | 0.1- 0.9 | 985 | 99.7 | 99.1-99.9 |
| 55-64 | 754 | 4 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.4 | 750 | 99.7 | 98.6-99.9 |
| 65-74 | 658 | 11 | 1.4 | 0.6- 3.3 | 647 | 98.6 | 96.7-99.4 |
| 75+ | 506 | 12 | 2.5 | 1.2- 5.4 | 494 | 97.5 | 94.6-98.8 |
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 520 | 9 | 1.8 | 0.7- 4.5 | 511 | 98.2 | 95.5-99.3 |
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 1,010 | 12 | 0.7 | 0.3- 1.3 | 998 | 99.3 | 98.7-99.7 |
| Some Post-H.S. | 748 | 4 | 0.3 | 0.1- 0.8 | 744 | 99.7 | 99.2-99.9 |
| College Graduate | 1,095 | 7 | 0.6 | 0.3- 1.5 | 1,088 | 99.4 | 98.5-99.7 |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 324 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.2- 3.0 | 322 | 99.3 | 97.0-99.8 |
| $15,000- 24,999 | 466 | 6 | 2.0 | 0.7- 5.5 | 460 | 98.0 | 94.5-99.3 |
| $25,000- 34,999 | 360 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.0- 0.7 | 358 | 99.8 | 99.3- 100 |
| $35,000- 49,999 | 450 | 4 | 0.9 | 0.3- 2.8 | 446 | 99.1 | 97.2-99.7 |
| $50,000-74,999 | 397 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.2 | 395 | 99.8 | 98.8- 100 |
| $75,000+ | 517 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.5 | 515 | 99.7 | 98.5-99.9 |
| COUNTY/REGION** | |||||||
| Buncombe | 253 | 4 | 1.6 | 0.5- 4.9 | 249 | 98.4 | 95.1-99.5 |
| Forsyth | 230 | 5 | 2.3 | 0.9- 6.0 | 225 | 97.7 | 94.0-99.1 |
| Guilford | 195 | 2 | 1.3 | 0.3- 6.0 | 193 | 98.7 | 94.0-99.7 |
| Henderson/Transylvania | 325 | 5 | 1.1 | 0.4- 2.8 | 320 | 98.9 | 97.2-99.6 |
| Mecklenburg | 174 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 174 | 100 | . - . |
| Orange | 219 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.6 | 218 | 99.8 | 98.4- 100 |
| Pitt | 161 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 161 | 100 | . - . |
| Randolph | 263 | 3 | 1.4 | 0.4- 5.0 | 260 | 98.6 | 95.0-99.6 |
| Robeson | 132 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 132 | 100 | . - . |
| Wake | 172 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 172 | 100 | . - . |
| Western NC | 423 | 6 | 1.2 | 0.5- 2.9 | 417 | 98.8 | 97.1-99.5 |
| Piedmont NC | 481 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.2 | 480 | 99.8 | 98.8- 100 |
| Eastern NC | 350 | 5 | 1.2 | 0.4- 3.1 | 345 | 98.8 | 96.9-99.6 |
* Data for this table includes respondents who reported being age 40 or older.
#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.
** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore,
Person, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 28JUL03.
