|
Select a different topic for Pitt County: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
| Total Respond.# |
Yes, past 12 months | Yes, 12+ months ago | No | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 6,430 | 12 | 0.2 | 0.1- 0.4 | 139 | 1.8 | 1.4- 2.3 | 6,279 | 98.0 | 97.5-98.4 |
| Pitt County | 405 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.1- 1.0 | 5 | 1.2 | 0.5- 3.0 | 398 | 98.6 | 96.8-99.4 |
| GENDER | ||||||||||
| Male | 157 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 2.0 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 156 | 99.7 | 98.0- 100 |
| Female | 248 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.3 | 5 | 2.4 | 0.9- 6.0 | 242 | 97.5 | 93.9-99.0 |
| RACE | ||||||||||
| White | 283 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 2 | 1.0 | 0.2- 4.0 | 281 | 99.0 | 96.0-99.8 |
| Other | 121 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.2- 3.0 | 3 | 1.6 | 0.5- 5.1 | 116 | 97.6 | 94.2-99.1 |
| AGE | ||||||||||
| 18-44 | 212 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.1 | 4 | 1.4 | 0.5- 3.6 | 207 | 98.5 | 96.2-99.4 |
| 45+ | 190 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 2.3 | 1 | 1.0 | 0.1- 6.5 | 188 | 98.7 | 94.1-99.7 |
| EDUCATION | ||||||||||
| H.S. or Less | 154 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.6 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.1- 4.2 | 152 | 99.2 | 96.2-99.8 |
| Some College + | 249 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.7 | 4 | 1.5 | 0.5- 4.5 | 244 | 98.2 | 95.4-99.3 |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | ||||||||||
| Less than $50,000 | 210 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.1- 1.9 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.2- 3.0 | 206 | 98.8 | 96.7-99.6 |
| $50,000+ | 99 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 99 | 100 | . - . |
| COUNTY/REGION** | ||||||||||
| Buncombe | 394 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.7 | 8 | 1.5 | 0.6- 3.5 | 385 | 98.4 | 96.4-99.3 |
| Forsyth | 448 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 11 | 2.7 | 1.4- 5.1 | 437 | 97.3 | 94.9-98.6 |
| Guilford | 404 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 9 | 2.2 | 1.1- 4.4 | 395 | 97.8 | 95.6-98.9 |
| Henderson/Transylvania | 455 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 14 | 2.6 | 1.4- 4.6 | 441 | 97.4 | 95.4-98.6 |
| Mecklenburg | 428 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.1- 3.1 | 10 | 1.6 | 0.8- 3.1 | 417 | 97.9 | 96.0-98.9 |
| Orange | 423 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.1- 2.9 | 5 | 0.7 | 0.3- 2.0 | 417 | 98.8 | 97.0-99.5 |
| Randolph | 414 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.1- 2.0 | 10 | 1.8 | 0.9- 3.4 | 402 | 97.8 | 95.9-98.8 |
| Robeson | 414 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.5 | 9 | 1.3 | 0.7- 2.7 | 404 | 98.6 | 97.2-99.3 |
| Wake | 412 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.1- 3.5 | 11 | 1.3 | 0.7- 2.4 | 400 | 98.2 | 96.4-99.1 |
| Western NC | 631 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 13 | 1.8 | 1.0- 3.3 | 618 | 98.2 | 96.7-99.0 |
| Piedmont NC | 841 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.1 | 16 | 1.7 | 1.0- 2.9 | 823 | 98.2 | 96.9-98.9 |
| Eastern NC | 761 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0- 0.2 | 18 | 2.2 | 1.3- 3.8 | 742 | 97.8 | 96.1-98.7 |
Back to Sexual Assault/Physical Violence.
*If YES, the responded was asked 'Has this happened to you in the past 12 months?'
#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.
** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore,
Person, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 14JUL03.
