Select a different topic for Randolph County: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
Total Respond.# |
Very important | Somewhat important | Not at all important | Don't know/Not sure | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
North Carolina | 4,971 | 4,709 | 94.8 | 93.8-95.7 | 187 | 3.5 | 2.9- 4.3 | 15 | 0.5 | 0.2- 1.1 | 60 | 1.2 | 0.8- 1.8 |
Randolph County | 308 | 288 | 95.1 | 92.0-97.0 | 9 | 2.1 | 1.1- 4.3 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 11 | 2.8 | 1.4- 5.5 |
GENDER | |||||||||||||
Male | 132 | 122 | 94.2 | 89.2-96.9 | 6 | 3.4 | 1.5- 7.5 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 4 | 2.4 | 0.9- 6.5 |
Female | 176 | 166 | 96.0 | 91.4-98.2 | 3 | 0.8 | 0.2- 2.6 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 7 | 3.2 | 1.2- 8.0 |
RACE | |||||||||||||
White | 276 | 259 | 95.9 | 93.1-97.6 | 9 | 2.4 | 1.2- 4.7 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 8 | 1.7 | 0.8- 3.9 |
Other | 32 | 29 | 88.0 | 67.4-96.3 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 3 | 12.0 | 3.7-32.6 |
AGE | |||||||||||||
18-44 | 175 | 170 | 97.5 | 93.5-99.1 | 3 | 1.3 | 0.4- 4.2 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 2 | 1.2 | 0.3- 5.6 |
45+ | 133 | 118 | 90.4 | 83.7-94.5 | 6 | 3.8 | 1.6- 8.7 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 9 | 5.9 | 2.8-11.9 |
EDUCATION | |||||||||||||
H.S. or Less | 191 | 178 | 94.0 | 89.5-96.7 | 6 | 2.4 | 1.1- 5.5 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 7 | 3.5 | 1.6- 7.7 |
Some College + | 117 | 110 | 97.0 | 93.1-98.7 | 3 | 1.6 | 0.4- 5.7 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 4 | 1.4 | 0.5- 3.9 |
HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||||||||
Less than $50,000 | 175 | 165 | 94.6 | 89.9-97.2 | 6 | 2.8 | 1.2- 6.4 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 4 | 2.6 | 1.0- 6.9 |
$50,000+ | 71 | 70 | 99.2 | 94.3-99.9 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 1 | 0.8 | 0.1- 5.7 |
COUNTY/REGION** | |||||||||||||
Buncombe | 292 | 281 | 95.2 | 91.0-97.5 | 7 | 3.2 | 1.5- 6.7 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 4 | 1.7 | 0.5- 5.2 |
Forsyth | 355 | 339 | 96.1 | 93.4-97.7 | 13 | 3.2 | 1.7- 5.7 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 2.4 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.9 |
Guilford | 301 | 284 | 94.0 | 90.0-96.5 | 13 | 4.5 | 2.4- 8.1 | 2 | 0.6 | 0.1- 2.5 | 2 | 1.0 | 0.2- 4.1 |
Henderson/Transylvania | 290 | 279 | 96.5 | 93.3-98.2 | 7 | 1.9 | 0.8- 4.4 | 2 | 0.6 | 0.1- 2.5 | 2 | 1.0 | 0.2- 4.2 |
Mecklenburg | 347 | 326 | 95.2 | 92.3-97.0 | 16 | 3.3 | 1.9- 5.5 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.9 | 4 | 1.4 | 0.5- 4.1 |
Orange | 351 | 333 | 95.8 | 93.1-97.5 | 13 | 2.6 | 1.5- 4.7 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.5 | 4 | 1.3 | 0.5- 3.7 |
Pitt | 345 | 331 | 95.7 | 92.5-97.6 | 13 | 4.1 | 2.3- 7.4 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.1 |
Robeson | 335 | 320 | 96.6 | 93.8-98.1 | 9 | 1.8 | 0.8- 3.9 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 6 | 1.6 | 0.6- 4.0 |
Wake | 356 | 334 | 93.7 | 89.6-96.3 | 19 | 5.2 | 2.9- 9.1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.7 | 2 | 0.9 | 0.2- 3.8 |
Western NC | 450 | 421 | 93.1 | 89.4-95.6 | 23 | 5.7 | 3.4- 9.3 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.1- 2.2 | 4 | 0.7 | 0.2- 1.9 |
Piedmont NC | 644 | 605 | 94.1 | 91.4-96.0 | 30 | 4.0 | 2.7- 6.0 | 3 | 1.1 | 0.3- 4.1 | 6 | 0.8 | 0.3- 1.9 |
Eastern NC | 597 | 568 | 96.0 | 93.8-97.4 | 15 | 1.9 | 1.1- 3.5 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.8 | 12 | 2.0 | 1.0- 3.8 |
* This question was asked only of respondents who reported being less than age 65.
#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.
** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore,
Person, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 14JUL03.