|
Select a different topic for Wake County: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
| Total Respond.# |
Worse than other races | Same as other races | Better than other races | Worse than some, better than others | Encountered people of same race | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 5,587 | 142 | 2.6 | 2.1- 3.3 | 4,862 | 89.4 | 88.1-90.5 | 532 | 7.1 | 6.2- 8.2 | 42 | 0.7 | 0.4- 1.1 | 9 | 0.2 | 0.1- 0.4 |
| Wake County | 359 | 11 | 2.0 | 1.0- 3.8 | 318 | 92.0 | 88.9-94.3 | 28 | 5.7 | 3.8- 8.5 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.3 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| GENDER | ||||||||||||||||
| Male | 158 | 3 | 1.2 | 0.4- 3.9 | 141 | 92.7 | 87.8-95.7 | 12 | 5.5 | 2.9-10.3 | 2 | 0.6 | 0.1- 2.4 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Female | 201 | 8 | 2.9 | 1.3- 6.1 | 177 | 91.3 | 86.9-94.3 | 16 | 5.8 | 3.5- 9.5 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| RACE | ||||||||||||||||
| White | 258 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.2- 2.9 | 231 | 91.6 | 87.5-94.5 | 24 | 7.4 | 4.7-11.3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 1.8 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Other | 99 | 9 | 4.9 | 2.3-10.0 | 86 | 93.4 | 88.1-96.4 | 3 | 1.3 | 0.4- 4.1 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.1- 3.1 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| AGE | ||||||||||||||||
| 18-44 | 208 | 8 | 2.2 | 1.0- 4.6 | 185 | 92.4 | 88.2-95.2 | 14 | 5.1 | 2.8- 9.0 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 1.9 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| 45+ | 147 | 3 | 1.7 | 0.5- 5.6 | 129 | 91.0 | 85.6-94.5 | 14 | 6.9 | 3.9-11.9 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.1- 2.8 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| EDUCATION | ||||||||||||||||
| H.S. or Less | 90 | 4 | 2.6 | 0.8- 7.6 | 82 | 95.5 | 90.5-97.9 | 4 | 1.9 | 0.7- 5.1 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Some College + | 269 | 7 | 1.8 | 0.8- 3.9 | 236 | 90.9 | 86.9-93.7 | 24 | 6.9 | 4.5-10.6 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.7 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | ||||||||||||||||
| Less than $50,000 | 129 | 7 | 3.7 | 1.6- 8.1 | 114 | 92.7 | 87.5-95.8 | 8 | 3.6 | 1.7- 7.4 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| $50,000+ | 157 | 2 | 1.1 | 0.3- 4.4 | 138 | 91.6 | 86.3-94.9 | 15 | 6.6 | 3.7-11.7 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.2- 2.8 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| COUNTY/REGION** | ||||||||||||||||
| Buncombe | 342 | 6 | 1.2 | 0.5- 2.8 | 290 | 87.0 | 82.8-90.3 | 45 | 11.4 | 8.3-15.6 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 2.1 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Forsyth | 389 | 7 | 1.5 | 0.6- 3.4 | 341 | 88.6 | 84.7-91.6 | 38 | 9.1 | 6.4-12.6 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.2- 3.1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.2 |
| Guilford | 346 | 11 | 4.0 | 1.9- 8.2 | 286 | 82.5 | 77.2-86.8 | 42 | 11.7 | 8.4-16.1 | 6 | 1.1 | 0.5- 2.6 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.1- 4.3 |
| Henderson/Transylvania | 381 | 8 | 2.4 | 1.1- 4.9 | 328 | 87.6 | 83.4-90.8 | 43 | 9.7 | 6.9-13.3 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.1- 1.6 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Mecklenburg | 383 | 18 | 3.8 | 2.3- 6.2 | 320 | 85.1 | 80.4-88.8 | 41 | 10.1 | 7.0-14.3 | 4 | 1.1 | 0.4- 3.1 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Orange | 370 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.1- 2.1 | 287 | 79.4 | 73.7-84.1 | 80 | 19.9 | 15.2-25.5 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.6 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Pitt | 350 | 5 | 1.2 | 0.5- 3.0 | 311 | 88.9 | 84.1-92.3 | 31 | 8.1 | 5.4-12.1 | 3 | 1.8 | 0.5- 6.4 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Randolph | 351 | 9 | 2.0 | 0.9- 4.4 | 312 | 90.6 | 86.7-93.4 | 27 | 6.8 | 4.4-10.4 | 3 | 0.6 | 0.2- 2.0 | 0 | 0.0 | . - . |
| Robeson | 362 | 13 | 3.3 | 1.8- 6.3 | 326 | 90.9 | 87.0-93.7 | 17 | 3.8 | 2.2- 6.6 | 5 | 1.6 | 0.7- 3.9 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.0- 2.1 |
| Western NC | 531 | 13 | 2.7 | 1.5- 4.8 | 479 | 91.2 | 88.3-93.5 | 32 | 5.0 | 3.4- 7.3 | 4 | 0.8 | 0.3- 2.2 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.1 |
| Piedmont NC | 735 | 17 | 2.1 | 1.2- 3.7 | 647 | 90.2 | 87.3-92.4 | 63 | 6.4 | 4.6- 8.7 | 7 | 1.2 | 0.5- 2.8 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.0- 1.1 |
| Eastern NC | 688 | 22 | 3.3 | 2.0- 5.3 | 617 | 90.2 | 86.9-92.7 | 45 | 6.2 | 4.2- 9.1 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.0- 0.4 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.1- 1.1 |
*Respondents, who reported not using health care, were excluded.
#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.
** Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, Wilson
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Franklin, Granville, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Montgomery, Moore,
Person, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Warren, Yadkin
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Watauga, Wilkes, Yancey
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 14JUL03.