SCHS Home Search FAQs Guestbook

North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics Navigation Bar

2011 BRFSS Survey Results: North Carolina Counties and AHEC Regions

Diabetes Control

Has a doctor ever told you that diabetes has affected your kidneys?*

View results for a demographic group:
Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^
Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 1,361 188 12.1 9.9-14.6 1,173 87.9 85.4-90.1
COUNTY/REGIONS
Alamance 46 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Buncombe 27 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Cabarrus 28 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Catawba 40 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Cumberland 39 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Davidson 45 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Durham 64 *** *** *** 55 89.2 78.5-95.0
Forsyth 32 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Gaston 46 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Guilford 64 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Iredell 30 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Johnston 28 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Mecklenburg 65 *** *** *** *** *** ***
New Hanover 31 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Onslow 39 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Orange 28 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Pitt 31 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Randolph 51 *** *** *** 46 91.1 79.0-96.6
Robeson 67 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Rowan 47 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Union 32 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Wake 51 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Wayne 47 *** *** *** *** *** ***
AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC)
Mountain AHEC 161 26 16.6 10.3-25.5 135 83.4 74.5-89.7
Northwest 283 32 10.3 6.3-16.4 251 89.7 83.6-93.7
Charlotte 179 28 14.2 8.4-22.9 151 85.8 77.1-91.6
Greensboro 202 29 11.3 6.5-19.0 173 88.7 81.0-93.5
Southern Regional 146 19 8.5 3.8-18.1 127 91.5 81.9-96.2
Coastal 57 *** *** *** 52 92.0 77.4-97.5
Wake 158 24 13.9 8.0-23.0 134 86.1 77.0-92.0
Area L 18 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Eastern 157 22 10.8 5.4-20.5 135 89.2 79.5-94.6

Back to Diabetes Control.

*Asked of all respondents with doctor-diagnosed diabetes.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2011 are NOT comparable to previous years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2011 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

NOTE: In 2011, the State Center for Health Statistics developed its own set of sample weights for N.C. counties and AHEC regions.
These county and AHEC weights cannot also be used to weight the data for the three N.C. regions. Consequently, regional results are not shown here, as in previous years.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50., % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 14NOV12.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook