SCHS Home Search FAQs Guestbook

North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics Navigation Bar

2011 BRFSS Survey Results: North Carolina Counties and AHEC Regions

Diabetes Control

In the last year, have you had a hospitalization or emergency visit because of your diabetes?*

View results for a demographic group:
Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^
Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 1,382 85 7.5 5.5-10.0 1,297 92.5 90.0-94.5
COUNTY/REGIONS
Alamance 46 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Buncombe 27 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Cabarrus 28 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Catawba 40 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Cumberland 42 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Davidson 45 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Durham 65 *** *** *** 62 97.7 92.7-99.3
Forsyth 33 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Gaston 48 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Guilford 64 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Iredell 31 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Johnston 29 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Mecklenburg 65 *** *** *** 62 96.0 87.4-98.8
New Hanover 32 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Onslow 40 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Orange 28 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Pitt 31 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Randolph 52 *** *** *** 50 96.5 85.5-99.2
Robeson 67 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Rowan 48 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Union 33 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Wake 51 *** *** *** 49 95.2 80.4-99.0
Wayne 46 *** *** *** *** *** ***
AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC)
Mountain AHEC 162 *** *** *** 152 94.3 88.6-97.3
Northwest 288 18 9.7 5.3-17.1 270 90.3 82.9-94.7
Charlotte 184 *** *** *** 174 93.3 86.3-96.8
Greensboro 203 12 7.9 3.6-16.3 191 92.1 83.7-96.4
Southern Regional 150 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Coastal 58 *** *** *** 55 98.0 90.6-99.6
Wake 160 *** *** *** 152 96.6 90.2-98.9
Area L 19 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Eastern 158 12 9.1 3.8-20.2 146 90.9 79.8-96.2

Back to Diabetes Control.

*Asked of all respondents with doctor-diagnosed diabetes.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2011 are NOT comparable to previous years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2011 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

NOTE: In 2011, the State Center for Health Statistics developed its own set of sample weights for N.C. counties and AHEC regions.
These county and AHEC weights cannot also be used to weight the data for the three N.C. regions. Consequently, regional results are not shown here, as in previous years.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50., % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 14NOV12.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook