2012 BRFSS Survey Results: Eastern North Carolina**

Use of Trails and Greenways

Does your community have trails, greenways, bike paths, or sidewalks for biking,
walking, or other activities?

View results for a demographic group:
 Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^		 Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 10,673 7,056 68.2 67.0-69.3 3,617 31.8 30.7-33.0
-Eastern NC 3,532 2,152 62.2 60.1-64.3 1,380 37.8 35.7-39.9
GENDER
Male 1,328 812 62.9 59.5-66.2 516 37.1 33.8-40.5
Female 2,204 1,340 61.6 58.9-64.2 864 38.4 35.8-41.1
RACE
White 2,227 1,400 63.1 60.5-65.6 827 36.9 34.4-39.5
African American 776 458 59.9 55.2-64.3 318 40.1 35.7-44.8
Other minorities 500 278 63.5 56.3-70.1 222 36.5 29.9-43.7
HISPANIC
Hispanic 179 126 73.2 65.1-80.1 53 26.8 19.9-34.9
Non-Hispanic 3,344 2,021 61.5 59.2-63.6 1,323 38.5 36.4-40.8
AGE
18-34 531 382 71.8 66.9-76.2 149 28.2 23.8-33.1
35-54 1,059 648 61.0 57.3-64.6 411 39.0 35.4-42.7
55-64 773 463 58.1 53.6-62.5 310 41.9 37.5-46.4
65-74 675 375 54.8 50.0-59.5 300 45.2 40.5-50.0
75+ 456 258 52.5 46.7-58.3 198 47.5 41.7-53.3
EDUCATION
Less Than H.S. 433 207 52.3 46.0-58.6 226 47.7 41.4-54.0
H.S. or G.E.D. 1,062 609 60.9 57.1-64.5 453 39.1 35.5-42.9
Some Post-H.S. 1,012 613 62.3 58.3-66.1 399 37.7 33.9-41.7
College Graduate 1,013 712 71.0 67.4-74.3 301 29.0 25.7-32.6
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $15,000 449 245 59.5 53.1-65.7 204 40.5 34.3-46.9
$15,000- 24,999 614 355 61.6 56.3-66.6 259 38.4 33.4-43.7
$25,000- 34,999 408 240 56.7 50.2-63.0 168 43.3 37.0-49.8
$35,000- 49,999 456 303 64.4 58.3-70.0 153 35.6 30.0-41.7
$50,000+ 1,011 678 68.1 64.5-71.5 333 31.9 28.5-35.5
DISABILITY STATUS
Yes 1,040 567 52.2 48.0-56.3 473 47.8 43.7-52.0
No 2,474 1,578 65.4 62.9-67.8 896 34.6 32.2-37.1
VETERAN STATUS
Veteran 525 322 61.6 56.2-66.7 203 38.4 33.3-43.8
Non-Veteran 3,007 1,830 62.3 60.0-64.6 1,177 37.7 35.4-40.0

Back to Use of Trails and Greenways.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2012 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2012 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

**Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 28AUG13.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook