|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 9,682 | 6,130 | 58.6 | 57.3-59.9 | 3,552 | 41.4 | 40.1-42.7 |
| COUNTY/REGIONS | |||||||
| Buncombe | 323 | 199 | 57.1 | 50.0-64.0 | 124 | 42.9 | 36.0-50.0 |
| Cumberland | 360 | 245 | 63.8 | 57.3-69.9 | 115 | 36.2 | 30.1-42.7 |
| Durham | 382 | 228 | 51.2 | 44.6-57.7 | 154 | 48.8 | 42.3-55.4 |
| Forsyth | 356 | 232 | 61.6 | 54.7-68.0 | 124 | 38.4 | 32.0-45.3 |
| Gaston | 292 | 186 | 61.4 | 53.1-69.0 | 106 | 38.6 | 31.0-46.9 |
| Guilford | 424 | 269 | 58.2 | 52.1-64.0 | 155 | 41.8 | 36.0-47.9 |
| Mecklenburg | 527 | 317 | 58.8 | 53.5-63.9 | 210 | 41.2 | 36.1-46.5 |
| New Hanover | 330 | 233 | 64.0 | 56.2-71.2 | 97 | 36.0 | 28.8-43.8 |
| Union | 342 | 223 | 61.6 | 53.5-69.2 | 119 | 38.4 | 30.8-46.5 |
| Wake | 592 | 373 | 60.2 | 55.2-64.9 | 219 | 39.8 | 35.1-44.8 |
| NC REGIONS | |||||||
| Eastern NC | 3,157 | 2,042 | 59.8 | 57.5-62.1 | 1,115 | 40.2 | 37.9-42.5 |
| Piedmont | 5,208 | 3,282 | 58.6 | 56.8-60.3 | 1,926 | 41.4 | 39.7-43.2 |
| Western NC | 1,317 | 806 | 54.9 | 51.3-58.5 | 511 | 45.1 | 41.5-48.7 |
| AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC) | |||||||
| Mountain AHEC | 901 | 551 | 54.2 | 49.6-58.6 | 350 | 45.8 | 41.4-50.4 |
| Northwest | 1,554 | 995 | 59.4 | 56.3-62.5 | 559 | 40.6 | 37.5-43.7 |
| Charlotte | 1,567 | 978 | 58.4 | 54.9-61.8 | 589 | 41.6 | 38.2-45.1 |
| Greensboro | 1,116 | 686 | 55.5 | 51.7-59.2 | 430 | 44.5 | 40.8-48.3 |
| Southern Regional | 1,233 | 807 | 62.0 | 58.1-65.7 | 426 | 38.0 | 34.3-41.9 |
| Southeast | 609 | 419 | 62.3 | 56.9-67.5 | 190 | 37.7 | 32.5-43.1 |
| Wake | 1,400 | 880 | 59.2 | 55.8-62.6 | 520 | 40.8 | 37.4-44.2 |
| Area L | 328 | 198 | 54.8 | 47.9-61.5 | 130 | 45.2 | 38.5-52.1 |
| Eastern | 974 | 616 | 58.6 | 54.7-62.5 | 358 | 41.4 | 37.5-45.3 |
*The pre-diabetes screening question is asked only of respondents who reported NOT having diabetes.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2012 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2012 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 05AUG13.
FOLLOW US