|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 10,064 | 1,014 | 8.8 | 8.1- 9.5 | 9,050 | 91.2 | 90.5-91.9 |
| COUNTY/REGIONS | |||||||
| Buncombe | 336 | 36 | 8.2 | 5.6-11.9 | 300 | 91.8 | 88.1-94.4 |
| Cumberland | 370 | 26 | 5.8 | 3.6- 9.0 | 344 | 94.2 | 91.0-96.4 |
| Durham | 397 | 36 | 6.1 | 4.1- 9.0 | 361 | 93.9 | 91.0-95.9 |
| Forsyth | 374 | 39 | 9.3 | 6.3-13.3 | 335 | 90.7 | 86.7-93.7 |
| Gaston | 304 | 26 | 8.4 | 5.3-13.2 | 278 | 91.6 | 86.8-94.7 |
| Guilford | 439 | 40 | 6.5 | 4.6- 9.1 | 399 | 93.5 | 90.9-95.4 |
| Mecklenburg | 548 | 35 | 6.1 | 3.9- 9.3 | 513 | 93.9 | 90.7-96.1 |
| New Hanover | 341 | 45 | 10.0 | 6.9-14.3 | 296 | 90.0 | 85.7-93.1 |
| Union | 351 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Wake | 616 | 52 | 7.4 | 5.4-10.0 | 564 | 92.6 | 90.0-94.6 |
| NC REGIONS | |||||||
| Eastern NC | 3,283 | 338 | 8.7 | 7.6- 9.9 | 2,945 | 91.3 | 90.1-92.4 |
| Piedmont | 5,409 | 522 | 8.5 | 7.6- 9.5 | 4,887 | 91.5 | 90.5-92.4 |
| Western NC | 1,372 | 154 | 10.3 | 8.3-12.6 | 1,218 | 89.7 | 87.4-91.7 |
| AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC) | |||||||
| Mountain AHEC | 934 | 102 | 9.1 | 6.9-11.9 | 832 | 90.9 | 88.1-93.1 |
| Northwest | 1,627 | 183 | 10.4 | 8.7-12.3 | 1,444 | 89.6 | 87.7-91.3 |
| Charlotte | 1,620 | 137 | 8.8 | 6.8-11.2 | 1,483 | 91.2 | 88.8-93.2 |
| Greensboro | 1,158 | 120 | 7.6 | 6.1- 9.4 | 1,038 | 92.4 | 90.6-93.9 |
| Southern Regional | 1,269 | 115 | 7.9 | 6.1-10.0 | 1,154 | 92.1 | 90.0-93.9 |
| Southeast | 630 | 77 | 10.1 | 7.6-13.2 | 553 | 89.9 | 86.8-92.4 |
| Wake | 1,458 | 127 | 7.3 | 5.9- 9.1 | 1,331 | 92.7 | 90.9-94.1 |
| Area L | 342 | 32 | 8.2 | 5.5-12.1 | 310 | 91.8 | 87.9-94.5 |
| Eastern | 1,026 | 121 | 9.9 | 8.0-12.1 | 905 | 90.1 | 87.9-92.0 |
*Females who reported being diagnosed with gestational pre-diabetes were included in the YES group.
The pre-diabetes screening question is asked only of respondents who reported NOT having diabetes.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2012 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2012 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 05AUG13.
FOLLOW US