SCHS Home Search FAQs Guestbook

North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics Navigation Bar

2012 BRFSS Survey Results: Piedmont North Carolina**

Adverse Childhood Experience

Did you live with anyone who used illegal street drugs or who abused prescription medications?

View results for a demographic group:
Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^
Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 10,927 868 10.2 9.4-11.1 10,059 89.8 88.9-90.6
-Piedmont NC 5,819 488 10.3 9.3-11.5 5,331 89.7 88.5-90.7
GENDER
Male 2,299 196 10.4 8.8-12.2 2,103 89.6 87.8-91.2
Female 3,520 292 10.3 9.0-11.8 3,228 89.7 88.2-91.0
RACE
White 4,245 328 9.9 8.8-11.2 3,917 90.1 88.8-91.2
African American 1,067 120 12.5 10.0-15.4 947 87.5 84.6-90.0
Other minorities 455 38 9.1 5.5-14.8 417 90.9 85.2-94.5
HISPANIC
Hispanic 387 32 7.0 4.6-10.6 355 93.0 89.4-95.4
Non-Hispanic 5,413 454 10.6 9.5-11.9 4,959 89.4 88.1-90.5
AGE
18-34 978 164 17.6 14.9-20.7 814 82.4 79.3-85.1
35-54 1,943 217 10.7 9.1-12.5 1,726 89.3 87.5-90.9
55-64 1,123 68 5.4 4.0- 7.1 1,055 94.6 92.9-96.0
65-74 981 20 2.1 1.3- 3.5 961 97.9 96.5-98.7
75+ 741 16 1.8 1.0- 3.1 725 98.2 96.9-99.0
EDUCATION
Less Than H.S. 722 65 12.7 9.7-16.6 657 87.3 83.4-90.3
H.S. or G.E.D. 1,607 133 11.3 9.1-14.0 1,474 88.7 86.0-90.9
Some Post-H.S. 1,553 165 11.6 9.7-13.7 1,388 88.4 86.3-90.3
College Graduate 1,918 124 6.4 5.2- 7.8 1,794 93.6 92.2-94.8
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $15,000 640 64 12.3 9.2-16.1 576 87.7 83.9-90.8
$15,000- 24,999 972 119 15.9 12.9-19.4 853 84.1 80.6-87.1
$25,000- 34,999 591 51 12.7 8.6-18.3 540 87.3 81.7-91.4
$35,000- 49,999 713 53 8.1 6.0-10.9 660 91.9 89.1-94.0
$50,000+ 1,924 146 7.8 6.4- 9.4 1,778 92.2 90.6-93.6
DISABILITY STATUS
Yes 1,471 149 13.3 10.9-16.2 1,322 86.7 83.8-89.1
No 4,326 337 9.6 8.4-10.9 3,989 90.4 89.1-91.6
VETERAN STATUS
Veteran 695 40 7.2 5.1-10.3 655 92.8 89.7-94.9
Non-Veteran 5,122 448 10.7 9.6-12.0 4,674 89.3 88.0-90.4

Back to Adverse Childhood Experience.

These questions have not been asked in previous years.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2012 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2012 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
**Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 05AUG13.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook