2012 BRFSS Survey Results: Piedmont North Carolina**

Use of Trails and Greenways

Does your community have trails, greenways, bike paths, or sidewalks for biking,
walking, or other activities?

View results for a demographic group:
 Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^		 Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 10,673 7,056 68.2 67.0-69.3 3,617 31.8 30.7-33.0
-Piedmont NC 5,683 3,872 70.4 68.9-72.0 1,811 29.6 28.0-31.1
GENDER
Male 2,240 1,522 70.9 68.4-73.2 718 29.1 26.8-31.6
Female 3,443 2,350 70.1 68.0-72.0 1,093 29.9 28.0-32.0
RACE
White 4,155 2,854 71.7 69.9-73.4 1,301 28.3 26.6-30.1
African American 1,041 695 66.8 63.0-70.4 346 33.2 29.6-37.0
Other minorities 438 291 69.8 63.9-75.1 147 30.2 24.9-36.1
HISPANIC
Hispanic 367 245 65.3 59.2-71.0 122 34.7 29.0-40.8
Non-Hispanic 5,299 3,617 70.9 69.3-72.5 1,682 29.1 27.5-30.7
AGE
18-34 942 700 74.6 71.1-77.9 242 25.4 22.1-28.9
35-54 1,890 1,367 73.4 70.9-75.7 523 26.6 24.3-29.1
55-64 1,113 745 66.1 62.5-69.6 368 33.9 30.4-37.5
65-74 964 617 64.4 60.5-68.1 347 35.6 31.9-39.5
75+ 721 406 57.0 52.3-61.5 315 43.0 38.5-47.7
EDUCATION
Less Than H.S. 692 386 58.7 53.8-63.4 306 41.3 36.6-46.2
H.S. or G.E.D. 1,554 961 66.5 63.5-69.4 593 33.5 30.6-36.5
Some Post-H.S. 1,530 1,026 70.3 67.3-73.1 504 29.7 26.9-32.7
College Graduate 1,888 1,487 81.5 79.4-83.5 401 18.5 16.5-20.6
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $15,000 621 365 59.5 54.2-64.6 256 40.5 35.4-45.8
$15,000- 24,999 934 574 63.6 59.6-67.5 360 36.4 32.5-40.4
$25,000- 34,999 576 374 65.5 60.4-70.4 202 34.5 29.6-39.6
$35,000- 49,999 702 494 71.8 67.3-75.9 208 28.2 24.1-32.7
$50,000+ 1,898 1,450 78.9 76.5-81.1 448 21.1 18.9-23.5
DISABILITY STATUS
Yes 1,434 859 61.7 58.4-64.9 575 38.3 35.1-41.6
No 4,225 3,002 72.8 71.0-74.5 1,223 27.2 25.5-29.0
VETERAN STATUS
Veteran 681 446 68.3 64.0-72.4 235 31.7 27.6-36.0
Non-Veteran 4,999 3,424 70.7 69.0-72.3 1,575 29.3 27.7-31.0

Back to Use of Trails and Greenways.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2012 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2012 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
**Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 28AUG13.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook