SCHS Home Search FAQs Guestbook

North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics Navigation Bar

2012 BRFSS Survey Results: Piedmont North Carolina**

Other Tobacco Products

In situations where you can not smoke, do you currently use any of the following products-
chewing tobacco, snuff, snus, nicotine water, dissolvable tobacco products
such as orbs or strips, or electronic cigarettes?*

View results for a demographic group:
Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^
Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 1,917 208 10.9 9.1-13.0 1,709 89.1 87.0-90.9
-Piedmont NC 974 118 11.4 8.8-14.7 856 88.6 85.3-91.2
GENDER
Male 430 56 13.3 9.2-18.7 374 86.7 81.3-90.8
Female 544 62 9.6 6.7-13.6 482 90.4 86.4-93.3
RACE
White 697 95 11.6 9.1-14.7 602 88.4 85.3-90.9
African American 200 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Other minorities 73 *** *** *** *** *** ***
HISPANIC
Hispanic 41 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Non-Hispanic 932 111 11.4 8.7-14.8 821 88.6 85.2-91.3
AGE
18-34 213 24 13.5 8.1-21.7 189 86.5 78.3-91.9
35-54 409 50 10.9 7.8-15.0 359 89.1 85.0-92.2
55-64 188 29 10.9 7.1-16.5 159 89.1 83.5-92.9
65-74 125 *** *** *** *** *** ***
75+ 34 *** *** *** *** *** ***
EDUCATION
Less Than H.S. 182 *** *** *** *** *** ***
H.S. or G.E.D. 339 38 10.4 7.0-15.1 301 89.6 84.9-93.0
Some Post-H.S. 293 39 11.6 7.9-16.7 254 88.4 83.3-92.1
College Graduate 158 16 9.6 5.6-16.0 142 90.4 84.0-94.4
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $15,000 197 27 12.3 7.6-19.3 170 87.7 80.7-92.4
$15,000- 24,999 233 *** *** *** *** *** ***
$25,000- 34,999 115 *** *** *** *** *** ***
$35,000- 49,999 130 *** *** *** *** *** ***
$50,000+ 176 24 12.8 7.9-20.2 152 87.2 79.8-92.1
DISABILITY STATUS
Yes 309 58 17.3 12.1-24.1 251 82.7 75.9-87.9
No 659 59 9.3 6.5-13.2 600 90.7 86.8-93.5
VETERAN STATUS
Veteran 110 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Non-Veteran 864 106 11.8 9.0-15.3 758 88.2 84.7-91.0

Back to Other Tobacco Products.

*Asked of current smokers.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2012 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2012 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
**Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 28AUG13.

SCHS Home | Search | FAQs | Guestbook