|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 1,555 | 854 | 55.9 | 52.6-59.1 | 701 | 44.1 | 40.9-47.4 |
| -Western NC | 217 | 116 | 52.7 | 44.1-61.1 | 101 | 47.3 | 38.9-55.9 |
| GENDER | |||||||
| Male | 93 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Female | 124 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| RACE | |||||||
| White | 176 | 96 | 53.7 | 44.2-63.0 | 80 | 46.3 | 37.0-55.8 |
| Other minorities | 40 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| HISPANIC | |||||||
| Hispanic | 5 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Non-Hispanic | 209 | 113 | 53.3 | 44.5-62.0 | 96 | 46.7 | 38.0-55.5 |
| AGE | |||||||
| 18-34 | 3 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 35-54 | 36 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 55-64 | 65 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 65-74 | 74 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 75+ | 37 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 49 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 73 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Some Post-H.S. | 49 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| College Graduate | 46 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 40 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $15,000- 24,999 | 55 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $25,000- 34,999 | 32 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $35,000- 49,999 | 21 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $50,000+ | 35 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| DISABILITY STATUS | |||||||
| Yes | 112 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| No | 100 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| VETERAN STATUS | |||||||
| Veteran | 31 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Non-Veteran | 186 | 95 | 49.3 | 40.1-58.6 | 91 | 50.7 | 41.4-59.9 |
*This question was asked of respondents with doctor-diagnosed diabetes.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2012 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2012 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore,
Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
**Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 02AUG13.
FOLLOW US