|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 7,052 | 6,462 | 90.0 | 89.0-91.0 | 590 | 10.0 | 9.0-11.0 |
| -Western NC | 969 | 899 | 91.1 | 88.0-93.5 | 70 | 8.9 | 6.5-12.0 |
| RACE | |||||||
| White | 790 | 746 | 92.8 | 89.3-95.2 | 44 | 7.2 | 4.8-10.7 |
| Other minorities | 174 | 149 | 83.2 | 74.1-89.6 | 25 | 16.8 | 10.4-25.9 |
| HISPANIC | |||||||
| Hispanic | 36 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Non-Hispanic | 930 | 866 | 91.9 | 88.7-94.2 | 64 | 8.1 | 5.8-11.3 |
| AGE | |||||||
| 18-34 | 130 | 108 | 79.9 | 69.9-87.1 | 22 | 20.1 | 12.9-30.1 |
| 35-54 | 251 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 55-64 | 209 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 65-74 | 221 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 75+ | 154 | 141 | 93.0 | 87.6-96.1 | 13 | 7.0 | 3.9-12.4 |
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 120 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 293 | 262 | 87.2 | 80.6-91.7 | 31 | 12.8 | 8.3-19.4 |
| Some Post-H.S. | 272 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| College Graduate | 282 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 147 | 128 | 84.6 | 75.3-90.9 | 19 | 15.4 | 9.1-24.7 |
| $15,000- 24,999 | 188 | 172 | 87.9 | 79.3-93.3 | 16 | 12.1 | 6.7-20.7 |
| $25,000- 34,999 | 106 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $35,000- 49,999 | 108 | 108 | 100 | . - . | *** | *** | *** |
| $50,000+ | 231 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| DISABILITY STATUS | |||||||
| Yes | 283 | 262 | 92.1 | 87.2-95.3 | 21 | 7.9 | 4.7-12.8 |
| No | 680 | 632 | 90.8 | 86.8-93.7 | 48 | 9.2 | 6.3-13.2 |
| VETERAN STATUS | |||||||
| Veteran | 15 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Non-Veteran | 954 | 884 | 91.0 | 87.9-93.4 | 70 | 9.0 | 6.6-12.1 |
Back to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening
(formerly Women's Health).
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2012 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2012 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore,
Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
**Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 02AUG13.
FOLLOW US