2013 BRFSS Survey Results: Eastern North Carolina**

Use of Trails and Greenways

Does your community have trails, greenways, bike paths, or sidewalks for biking,
walking, or other activities?

View results for a demographic group:
 Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
Total
Respond.^		 Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 3,866 2,393 64.0 61.9-66.1 1,473 36.0 33.9-38.1
-Eastern NC 1,137 586 51.9 47.7-56.1 551 48.1 43.9-52.3
GENDER
Male 434 232 54.9 48.1-61.4 202 45.1 38.6-51.9
Female 703 354 49.0 43.9-54.1 349 51.0 45.9-56.1
RACE
White 647 351 51.6 46.4-56.7 296 48.4 43.3-53.6
African American 286 144 53.9 45.4-62.2 142 46.1 37.8-54.6
Other minorities 194 *** *** *** *** *** ***
HISPANIC
Hispanic 43 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Non-Hispanic 1,089 560 51.9 47.5-56.2 529 48.1 43.8-52.5
AGE
18-34 141 81 57.3 47.0-66.9 60 42.7 33.1-53.0
35-54 315 169 54.9 47.5-62.2 146 45.1 37.8-52.5
55-64 271 139 50.3 42.4-58.1 132 49.7 41.9-57.6
65-74 229 98 38.9 30.6-47.9 131 61.1 52.1-69.4
75+ 171 92 45.3 35.4-55.6 79 54.7 44.4-64.6
EDUCATION
Less Than H.S. 160 *** *** *** *** *** ***
H.S. or G.E.D. 328 163 47.3 39.5-55.2 165 52.7 44.8-60.5
Some Post-H.S. 321 157 52.0 44.3-59.6 164 48.0 40.4-55.7
College Graduate 326 206 66.9 59.7-73.4 120 33.1 26.6-40.3
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $15,000 159 *** *** *** *** *** ***
$15,000- 24,999 200 90 42.5 33.3-52.2 110 57.5 47.8-66.7
$25,000- 34,999 129 *** *** *** *** *** ***
$35,000- 49,999 142 *** *** *** *** *** ***
$50,000+ 307 190 59.6 52.1-66.7 117 40.4 33.3-47.9
DISABILITY STATUS
Yes 365 150 38.2 31.4-45.5 215 61.8 54.5-68.6
No 763 430 56.7 51.6-61.7 333 43.3 38.3-48.4
VETERAN STATUS
Veteran 178 91 52.1 42.3-61.7 87 47.9 38.3-57.7
Non-Veteran 959 495 51.9 47.2-56.5 464 48.1 43.5-52.8
RURAL COUNTY RESIDENT
Yes 836 398 50.0 45.1-54.9 438 50.0 45.1-54.9
No 301 188 60.4 52.8-67.5 113 39.6 32.5-47.2

Back to Use of Trails and Greenways.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2013
are NOT comparable to 2010 and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2013 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

**Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 06AUG14.

SCHS Home | FAQs | Contacts