|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Median Daily Fruit Intake | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Lower C.I.(95%) | Upper C.I.(95%) | |||||
| TOTAL | 8,478 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | |||
| GENDER | |||||||
| Male | 3,290 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 | |||
| Female | 5,188 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | |||
| RACE/ETHNICITY | |||||||
| Non-Hispanic White | 5,752 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.00 | |||
| Non-Hispanic Black | 1,557 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.02 | |||
| Non-Hispanic Am Indian | 383 | 0.97 | 0.66 | 1.30 | |||
| Non-Hispanic Other | 250 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 1.11 | |||
| Hispanic | 448 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 1.13 | |||
| AGE | |||||||
| 18-24 | 436 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 1.11 | |||
| 25-34 | 863 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.07 | |||
| 35-44 | 1,113 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.02 | |||
| 45-54 | 1,416 | 0.98 | 0.89 | 1.00 | |||
| 55-64 | 1,748 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.01 | |||
| 65-74 | 1,576 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.02 | |||
| 75+ | 1,244 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.05 | |||
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 1,133 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.01 | |||
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 2,347 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 1.01 | |||
| Some Post-H.S. | 2,315 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | |||
| College Graduate | 2,674 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.10 | |||
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 1,051 | 0.91 | 0.74 | 1.01 | |||
| $15,000- 24,999 | 1,522 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.02 | |||
| $25,000- 34,999 | 827 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.00 | |||
| $35,000- 49,999 | 982 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.02 | |||
| $50,000-74,999 | 904 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.04 | |||
| $75,000+ | 1,586 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.05 | |||
| DISABILITY STATUS | |||||||
| Yes | 2,472 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 1.00 | |||
| No | 5,962 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | |||
| VETERAN STATUS | |||||||
| Veteran | 1,105 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 1.01 | |||
| Non-Veteran | 7,369 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | |||
| RURAL COUNTY RESIDENT | |||||||
| Yes | 4,363 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | |||
| No | 4,115 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | |||
Back to Fruits and Vegetables.
NOTE: The fruit and vegetable questions for 2011 and 2013 have changed from the FV questions used in in 2009 and earlier years.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2013 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2013 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 09SEP14.
FOLLOW US