|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 1,677 | 1,611 | 95.8 | 94.2-97.0 | 66 | 4.2 | 3.0- 5.8 |
| -Piedmont NC | 901 | 866 | 95.7 | 93.3-97.3 | 35 | 4.3 | 2.7- 6.7 |
| GENDER | |||||||
| Male | 355 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Female | 546 | 520 | 95.4 | 92.5-97.1 | 26 | 4.6 | 2.9- 7.5 |
| RACE | |||||||
| White | 620 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| African American | 242 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Other minorities | 32 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| HISPANIC | |||||||
| Hispanic | 16 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Non-Hispanic | 882 | 847 | 95.6 | 93.1-97.2 | 35 | 4.4 | 2.8- 6.9 |
| AGE | |||||||
| 18-34 | 60 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 35-54 | 248 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 55-64 | 245 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 65-74 | 190 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 75+ | 156 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 193 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 309 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Some Post-H.S. | 236 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| College Graduate | 163 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 246 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $15,000- 24,999 | 224 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $25,000- 34,999 | 70 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $35,000- 49,999 | 72 | 72 | 100 | . - . | *** | *** | *** |
| No | 164 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| VETERAN STATUS | |||||||
| Veteran | 140 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Non-Veteran | 761 | 728 | 95.1 | 92.3-96.9 | 33 | 4.9 | 3.1- 7.7 |
| RURAL COUNTY RESIDENT | |||||||
| Yes | 345 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| No | 556 | 530 | 95.4 | 92.3-97.3 | 26 | 4.6 | 2.7- 7.7 |
*Asked only of those who considered themselves to have a disabilty.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2013
are NOT comparable to 2010 and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2013 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
**Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore,
Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 06AUG14.
FOLLOW US