2013 BRFSS Survey Results: Piedmont North Carolina**

Use of Trails and Greenways

Does your community have trails, greenways, bike paths, or sidewalks for biking,
walking, or other activities?

View results for a demographic group:
 Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
Total
Respond.^		 Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 3,866 2,393 64.0 61.9-66.1 1,473 36.0 33.9-38.1
-Piedmont NC 2,263 1,477 69.5 66.7-72.1 786 30.5 27.9-33.3
GENDER
Male 890 577 67.3 62.8-71.5 313 32.7 28.5-37.2
Female 1,373 900 71.4 68.1-74.5 473 28.6 25.5-31.9
RACE
White 1,676 1,087 69.3 66.1-72.4 589 30.7 27.6-33.9
African American 429 280 68.1 62.0-73.6 149 31.9 26.4-38.0
Other minorities 140 97 72.5 62.1-81.0 43 27.5 19.0-37.9
HISPANIC
Hispanic 150 108 72.9 63.8-80.4 42 27.1 19.6-36.2
Non-Hispanic 2,104 1,361 69.0 66.1-71.8 743 31.0 28.2-33.9
AGE
18-34 325 245 76.9 70.4-82.2 80 23.1 17.8-29.6
35-54 709 484 69.9 65.4-74.0 225 30.1 26.0-34.6
55-64 451 281 63.7 57.8-69.3 170 36.3 30.7-42.2
65-74 408 254 64.1 57.6-70.1 154 35.9 29.9-42.4
75+ 349 196 52.1 44.9-59.2 153 47.9 40.8-55.1
EDUCATION
Less Than H.S. 306 150 53.2 45.5-60.7 156 46.8 39.3-54.5
H.S. or G.E.D. 572 348 69.7 64.6-74.4 224 30.3 25.6-35.4
Some Post-H.S. 583 388 70.1 64.3-75.3 195 29.9 24.7-35.7
College Graduate 800 590 78.0 74.2-81.5 210 22.0 18.5-25.8
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $15,000 230 136 61.5 52.3-69.9 94 38.5 30.1-47.7
$15,000- 24,999 388 222 61.1 54.5-67.3 166 38.9 32.7-45.5
$25,000- 34,999 216 136 64.8 55.8-72.8 80 35.2 27.2-44.2
$35,000- 49,999 250 180 73.5 65.9-80.0 70 26.5 20.0-34.1
$50,000+ 737 533 76.4 71.4-80.7 204 23.6 19.3-28.6
DISABILITY STATUS
Yes 611 338 55.4 49.9-60.8 273 44.6 39.2-50.1
No 1,641 1,131 73.1 70.0-76.0 510 26.9 24.0-30.0
VETERAN STATUS
Veteran 262 161 69.1 61.7-75.7 101 30.9 24.3-38.3
Non-Veteran 1,998 1,314 69.6 66.7-72.4 684 30.4 27.6-33.3
RURAL COUNTY RESIDENT
Yes 847 456 55.0 50.1-59.7 391 45.0 40.3-49.9
No 1,416 1,021 75.6 72.3-78.6 395 24.4 21.4-27.7

Back to Use of Trails and Greenways.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2013
are NOT comparable to 2010 and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2013 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
**Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 06AUG14.

SCHS Home | FAQs | Contacts