NC Department of Health and Human Services
N.C. State Center for Health Statistics Home
N.C. Public Health Home

2014 BRFSS Survey Results: Piedmont North Carolina**

Gambling

Have there ever been periods for 2 weeks or more when you spent a lot of time thinking about
gambling or planning future gambling?*

View results for a demographic group:
Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^
Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 1,424 41 3.4 2.4- 4.8 1,383 96.6 95.2-97.6
-Piedmont NC 764 23 3.4 2.2- 5.4 741 96.6 94.6-97.8
GENDER
Male 418 17 4.4 2.6- 7.4 401 95.6 92.6-97.4
Female 346 *** *** *** *** *** ***
RACE
White 555 *** *** *** *** *** ***
African American 148 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Other minorities 54 *** *** *** *** *** ***
HISPANIC
Hispanic 50 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Non-Hispanic 707 19 3.2 2.0- 5.3 688 96.8 94.7-98.0
AGE
18-34 120 *** *** *** *** *** ***
35-54 284 *** *** *** *** *** ***
55-64 168 *** *** *** *** *** ***
65-74 129 *** *** *** *** *** ***
75+ 57 *** *** *** *** *** ***
EDUCATION
Less Than H.S. 76 *** *** *** *** *** ***
H.S. or G.E.D. 190 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Some Post-H.S. 207 *** *** *** *** *** ***
College Graduate 290 *** *** *** *** *** ***
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Less than $15,000 46 *** *** *** *** *** ***
$15,000- 24,999 103 *** *** *** *** *** ***
$25,000- 34,999 88 *** *** *** *** *** ***
$35,000- 49,999 95 *** *** *** *** *** ***
$50,000+ 344 *** *** *** *** *** ***
DISABILITY STATUS
Yes 198 *** *** *** *** *** ***
No 562 19 3.7 2.2- 6.1 543 96.3 93.9-97.8
VETERAN STATUS
Veteran 118 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Non-Veteran 646 21 3.8 2.4- 6.1 625 96.2 93.9-97.6
RURAL COUNTY RESIDENT
Yes 229 *** *** *** *** *** ***
No 535 19 4.2 2.6- 6.9 516 95.8 93.1-97.4

Back to Gambling.

*Asked only of respondents who have gambled or played any games for money.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2014 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2014 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
**Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 16SEP15.

SCHS Home | FAQs | Contacts