|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 6,347 | 146 | 1.9 | 1.6- 2.3 | 6,201 | 98.1 | 97.7-98.4 |
| -Western NC | 921 | 26 | 2.4 | 1.5- 3.7 | 895 | 97.6 | 96.3-98.5 |
| GENDER | |||||||
| Male | 392 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Female | 529 | 23 | 3.6 | 2.3- 5.6 | 506 | 96.4 | 94.4-97.7 |
| RACE | |||||||
| White | 838 | 25 | 2.2 | 1.4- 3.5 | 813 | 97.8 | 96.5-98.6 |
| Other minorities | 73 | *** | *** | *** | 73 | 100 | . - . |
| AGE | |||||||
| 18-34 | 106 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 35-54 | 216 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 55-64 | 203 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 65-74 | 228 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 75+ | 159 | *** | *** | *** | 159 | 100 | . - . |
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 125 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 265 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Some Post-H.S. | 244 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| College Graduate | 281 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 96 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $15,000- 24,999 | 176 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $25,000- 34,999 | 95 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $35,000- 49,999 | 138 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $50,000+ | 231 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| DISABILITY STATUS | |||||||
| Yes | 294 | 20 | 6.4 | 3.8-10.7 | 274 | 93.6 | 89.3-96.2 |
| No | 623 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| VETERAN STATUS | |||||||
| Veteran | 139 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Non-Veteran | 782 | 25 | 2.4 | 1.5- 3.6 | 757 | 97.6 | 96.4-98.5 |
| RURAL COUNTY RESIDENT | |||||||
| Yes | 743 | 23 | 2.5 | 1.5- 4.1 | 720 | 97.5 | 95.9-98.5 |
| No | 178 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Back to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2014 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2014 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene,
Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore,
Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
**Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 16SEP15.
FOLLOW US