|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 6,548 | 752 | 11.6 | 10.7-12.5 | 5,796 | 88.4 | 87.5-89.3 |
| -Eastern | 2,148 | 274 | 13.4 | 11.8-15.3 | 1,874 | 86.6 | 84.7-88.2 |
| GENDER | |||||||
| Male | 911 | 110 | 11.8 | 9.5-14.5 | 801 | 88.2 | 85.5-90.5 |
| Female | 1,237 | 164 | 15.0 | 12.7-17.8 | 1,073 | 85.0 | 82.2-87.3 |
| RACE | |||||||
| Non-Hispanic White | 1,333 | 147 | 12.1 | 10.0-14.5 | 1,186 | 87.9 | 85.5-90.0 |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 549 | 88 | 15.4 | 12.2-19.1 | 461 | 84.6 | 80.9-87.8 |
| Other | 234 | 36 | 16.4 | 11.4-23.1 | 198 | 83.6 | 76.9-88.6 |
| AGE | |||||||
| 18-34 | 387 | 43 | 10.9 | 8.0-14.8 | 344 | 89.1 | 85.2-92.0 |
| 35-44 | 286 | 41 | 14.4 | 10.1-20.1 | 245 | 85.6 | 79.9-89.9 |
| 45-54 | 356 | 54 | 16.1 | 12.1-21.1 | 302 | 83.9 | 78.9-87.9 |
| 55-64 | 479 | 64 | 15.6 | 12.0-20.1 | 415 | 84.4 | 79.9-88.0 |
| 65-74 | 366 | 38 | 11.7 | 8.1-16.6 | 328 | 88.3 | 83.4-91.9 |
| 75+ | 249 | 33 | 15.6 | 10.7-22.2 | 216 | 84.4 | 77.8-89.3 |
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 244 | 62 | 24.9 | 18.9-31.9 | 182 | 75.1 | 68.1-81.1 |
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 687 | 102 | 13.1 | 10.5-16.2 | 585 | 86.9 | 83.8-89.5 |
| Some Post-H.S. | 641 | 78 | 12.2 | 9.5-15.4 | 563 | 87.8 | 84.6-90.5 |
| College Graduate | 568 | 30 | 5.8 | 3.8- 8.7 | 538 | 94.2 | 91.3-96.2 |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 222 | 60 | 29.3 | 22.4-37.3 | 162 | 70.7 | 62.7-77.6 |
| $15,000- 24,999 | 390 | 67 | 16.5 | 12.7-21.2 | 323 | 83.5 | 78.8-87.3 |
| $25,000- 34,999 | 182 | 24 | 15.2 | 9.4-23.7 | 158 | 84.8 | 76.3-90.6 |
| $35,000- 49,999 | 236 | 20 | 7.5 | 4.6-12.0 | 216 | 92.5 | 88.0-95.4 |
| $50,000- 74,999 | 275 | 19 | 8.0 | 4.7-13.5 | 256 | 92.0 | 86.5-95.3 |
| $75,000+ | 399 | 15 | 4.9 | 2.8- 8.5 | 384 | 95.1 | 91.5-97.2 |
| DISABILITY STATUS | |||||||
| Yes | 660 | 193 | 32.4 | 28.1-37.0 | 467 | 67.6 | 63.0-71.9 |
| No | 1,480 | 80 | 6.0 | 4.7- 7.8 | 1,400 | 94.0 | 92.2-95.3 |
| VETERAN STATUS | |||||||
| Veteran | 360 | 48 | 14.1 | 10.3-19.0 | 312 | 85.9 | 81.0-89.7 |
| Non-Veteran | 1,783 | 224 | 13.3 | 11.4-15.3 | 1,559 | 86.7 | 84.7-88.6 |
| RURAL-URBAN CATEGORY | |||||||
| Urban | 162 | 19 | 15.5 | 9.3-24.5 | 143 | 84.5 | 75.5-90.7 |
| Regional City or Suburban | 292 | 36 | 13.1 | 9.2-18.4 | 256 | 86.9 | 81.6-90.8 |
| Rural | 1,694 | 219 | 13.3 | 11.4-15.4 | 1,475 | 86.7 | 84.6-88.6 |
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2015 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2015 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
**Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 21SEP16.
FOLLOW US