|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 837 | 487 | 56.4 | 52.3-60.4 | 350 | 43.6 | 39.6-47.7 |
| -Non-Hispanic Black | 241 | 138 | 55.5 | 47.8-62.9 | 103 | 44.5 | 37.1-52.2 |
| GENDER | |||||||
| Male | 80 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Female | 161 | 91 | 54.2 | 44.6-63.5 | 70 | 45.8 | 36.5-55.4 |
| AGE | |||||||
| 18-34 | 9 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 35-44 | 19 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 45-54 | 47 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 55-64 | 63 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 65-74 | 65 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 75+ | 36 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 48 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 95 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Some Post-H.S. | 56 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| College Graduate | 42 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 55 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $15,000- 24,999 | 67 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $25,000- 34,999 | 11 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $35,000- 49,999 | 26 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $50,000- 74,999 | 10 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $75,000+ | 18 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| DISABILITY STATUS | |||||||
| Yes | 119 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| No | 114 | *** | *** | *** | 44 | 38.7 | 29.0-49.4 |
| VETERAN STATUS | |||||||
| Veteran | 31 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Non-Veteran | 210 | 115 | 53.0 | 44.8-61.0 | 95 | 47.0 | 39.0-55.2 |
| RURAL-URBAN CATEGORY | |||||||
| Urban | 72 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Regional City or Suburban | 34 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Rural | 135 | 81 | 61.9 | 51.9-71.0 | 54 | 38.1 | 29.0-48.1 |
*This question was asked of respondents with doctor-diagnosed diabetes.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2015 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2015 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 21SEP16.
FOLLOW US