|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 838 | 269 | 31.8 | 28.2-35.7 | 569 | 68.2 | 64.3-71.8 |
| -Non-Hispanic Black | 241 | 88 | 35.3 | 28.5-42.7 | 153 | 64.7 | 57.3-71.5 |
| GENDER | |||||||
| Male | 80 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Female | 161 | 56 | 34.5 | 26.3-43.7 | 105 | 65.5 | 56.3-73.7 |
| AGE | |||||||
| 18-34 | 9 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 35-44 | 19 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 45-54 | 47 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 55-64 | 63 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 65-74 | 65 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| 75+ | 36 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 48 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 95 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Some Post-H.S. | 56 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| College Graduate | 42 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 55 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $15,000- 24,999 | 67 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $25,000- 34,999 | 11 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $35,000- 49,999 | 26 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $50,000- 74,999 | 10 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| $75,000+ | 18 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| DISABILITY STATUS | |||||||
| Yes | 119 | 45 | 36.7 | 27.0-47.5 | *** | *** | *** |
| No | 114 | 43 | 35.8 | 26.3-46.4 | 71 | 64.2 | 53.6-73.7 |
| VETERAN STATUS | |||||||
| Veteran | 31 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Non-Veteran | 210 | 75 | 33.3 | 26.3-41.2 | 135 | 66.7 | 58.8-73.7 |
| RURAL-URBAN CATEGORY | |||||||
| Urban | 72 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Regional City or Suburban | 34 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
| Rural | 135 | 54 | 41.8 | 32.3-51.9 | 81 | 58.2 | 48.1-67.7 |
*This question was asked of respondents with doctor-diagnosed diabetes.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2015 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2015 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 21SEP16.
FOLLOW US