|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Median Daily Fruit Intake | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Lower C.I.(95%) | Upper C.I.(95%) | |||||
| TOTAL | 6,085 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.02 | |||
| GENDER | |||||||
| Male | 2,596 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 1.01 | |||
| Female | 3,489 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.02 | |||
| RACE/ETHNICITY | |||||||
| Non-Hispanic White | 4,132 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.02 | |||
| Non-Hispanic Black | 1,136 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.03 | |||
| Non-Hispanic Am Indian | 86 | 0.87 | 0.48 | 1.00 | |||
| Non-Hispanic Other | 202 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 1.15 | |||
| Hispanic | 453 | 1.13 | 0.99 | 1.28 | |||
| AGE | |||||||
| 18-34 | 1,126 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.01 | |||
| 35-44 | 867 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.02 | |||
| 45-54 | 1,078 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.01 | |||
| 55-64 | 1,241 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.02 | |||
| 65-74 | 1,042 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 1.00 | |||
| 75+ | 662 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.11 | |||
| EDUCATION | |||||||
| Less Than H.S. | 619 | 0.89 | 0.70 | 0.94 | |||
| H.S. or G.E.D. | 1,634 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 1.00 | |||
| Some Post-H.S. | 1,708 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.02 | |||
| College Graduate | 2,102 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.07 | |||
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
| Less than $15,000 | 543 | 0.86 | 0.67 | 0.94 | |||
| $15,000- 24,999 | 1,008 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.00 | |||
| $25,000- 34,999 | 550 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.04 | |||
| $35,000- 49,999 | 693 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 1.01 | |||
| $50,000-74,999 | 777 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.00 | |||
| $75,000+ | 1,363 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.05 | |||
| DISABILITY STATUS | |||||||
| Yes | 1,630 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 1.01 | |||
| No | 4,433 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.01 | |||
| VETERAN STATUS | |||||||
| Veteran | 825 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.02 | |||
| Non-Veteran | 5,246 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.01 | |||
| RURAL-URBAN CATEGORY | |||||||
| Urban | 1,808 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.04 | |||
| Regional City or Suburban | 1,338 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.01 | |||
| Rural | 2,939 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.01 | |||
Back to Fruits and Vegetables.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2015 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2015 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 20SEP16.
FOLLOW US