2015 BRFSS Survey Results: North Carolina Regions

Health Care Access

Do you have one person you think of as your personal doctor or health care provider?

View results for a demographic group:
 Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^		 Yes, only one Yes, more than one No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 6,685 4,441 64.1 62.7-65.5 1,037 14.2 13.2-15.3 1,207 21.7 20.4-23.0
NC ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR REGIONS
Region 1 & 2 1,012 682 65.2 61.2-69.1 167 14.9 12.4-17.9 163 19.8 16.6-23.5
Region 3 610 417 63.2 58.0-68.1 96 15.6 12.3-19.7 97 21.1 16.9-26.1
Region 4 1,217 830 67.0 63.8-70.1 175 13.0 11.0-15.3 212 20.0 17.4-22.8
Region 5 823 517 62.1 58.1-65.9 135 16.4 13.6-19.7 171 21.5 18.5-24.9
Region 6 516 317 57.7 52.6-62.7 85 15.5 12.4-19.3 114 26.7 22.2-31.8
Region 7 907 603 66.6 63.0-70.1 125 12.1 10.0-14.7 179 21.2 18.3-24.5
Region 8 666 425 60.6 56.1-64.9 122 15.8 13.0-19.1 119 23.6 19.7-28.0
Region 9 & 10 934 650 64.2 59.7-68.5 132 12.4 9.6-15.8 152 23.4 19.6-27.7
STATE REGIONS
Eastern NC 2,199 1,461 62.8 60.2-65.3 342 13.5 11.9-15.3 396 23.7 21.4-26.2
Piedmont 3,353 2,217 64.7 62.8-66.6 508 14.2 12.9-15.6 628 21.1 19.5-22.8
Western NC 1,133 763 64.3 60.4-68.0 187 15.9 13.2-19.0 183 19.8 16.8-23.3
AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC)
Mountain AHEC 848 561 63.0 58.4-67.3 147 16.4 13.4-19.9 140 20.6 17.0-24.8
Northwest 994 686 65.8 62.0-69.5 159 14.7 12.2-17.6 149 19.5 16.3-23.1
Charlotte 1,017 695 66.7 63.2-70.0 135 12.7 10.6-15.3 187 20.6 17.8-23.7
Greensboro 613 390 62.9 58.2-67.2 106 17.4 14.1-21.3 117 19.8 16.3-23.7
Southern Regional 601 370 58.3 53.6-62.9 105 15.5 12.6-18.8 126 26.2 22.1-30.9
Southeast 383 251 63.5 57.5-69.2 72 15.2 11.8-19.4 60 21.3 16.3-27.2
Wake 1,021 655 64.2 60.8-67.5 146 12.9 10.8-15.4 220 22.9 20.0-26.0
Area L & Eastern 1,208 833 64.3 60.5-67.9 167 12.2 9.9-15.0 208 23.5 20.3-27.0

Back to Health Care Access.

See Technical Notes for counties in Local Health Director, State and AHEC regions.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2015 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2015 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 21SEP16.

SCHS Home | FAQs | Contacts