View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
North Carolina | 1,177 | 40 | 3.2 | 2.2- 4.7 | 1,137 | 96.8 | 95.3-97.8 |
-Piedmont | 640 | 17 | 2.8 | 1.6- 4.8 | 623 | 97.2 | 95.2-98.4 |
GENDER | |||||||
Male | 293 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Female | 347 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
RACE | |||||||
Non-Hispanic White | 490 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Non-Hispanic Black | 98 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Other | 43 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
AGE | |||||||
18-34 | 61 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
35-44 | 115 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
45-54 | 134 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
55-64 | 143 | *** | *** | *** | 143 | 100 | . - . |
65-74 | 114 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
75+ | 62 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
EDUCATION | |||||||
Less Than H.S. | 28 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
H.S. or G.E.D. | 113 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Some Post-H.S. | 159 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
College Graduate | 336 | 12 | 4.1 | 2.3- 7.3 | 324 | 95.9 | 92.7-97.7 |
HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||
Less than $15,000 | 29 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
$15,000- 24,999 | 48 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
$25,000- 34,999 | 36 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
$35,000- 49,999 | 71 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
$50,000- 74,999 | 84 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
$75,000+ | 274 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
DISABILITY STATUS | |||||||
Yes | 142 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
No | 495 | 16 | 3.2 | 1.8- 5.6 | 479 | 96.8 | 94.4-98.2 |
VETERAN STATUS | |||||||
Veteran | 85 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Non-Veteran | 549 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
RURAL-URBAN CATEGORY | |||||||
Urban | 391 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Regional City or Suburban | 154 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Rural | 95 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
* Asked only of respondents that reported that their household had been tested for the presence of radon gas.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2015 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2015 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
Eastern North Carolina: Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Edgecombe, Gates, Greene, Halifax, Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lenoir, Martin, Nash, New Hanover, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Robeson, Sampson, Scotland, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne, and Wilson counties.
**Piedmont North Carolina: Alamance, Alexander, Anson, Cabarrus, Caswell, Catawba, Chatham, Cleveland, Davidson, Davie, Durham, Forsyth, Franklin, Gaston, Granville, Guilford, Iredell, Lee, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, Orange, Person, Randolph, Richmond, Rockingham, Rowan, Stanly, Stokes, Union, Vance, Wake, Warren, and Yadkin counties.
Western North Carolina: Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, McDowell, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Surry, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yancey counties.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 21SEP16.