|
View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
| View results for a different geographical area: |
|
| Total Respond.^ |
Yes | Yes, during pregnancy | No | No, borderline diabetes | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
| North Carolina | 6,691 | 858 | 10.7 | 9.9-11.5 | 42 | 0.8 | 0.5- 1.1 | 5,650 | 86.9 | 86.0-87.8 | 141 | 1.7 | 1.4- 2.0 |
| Region 4 | 1,220 | 151 | 10.6 | 8.9-12.5 | 10 | 1.2 | 0.6- 2.3 | 1,037 | 86.8 | 84.6-88.8 | 22 | 1.4 | 0.9- 2.3 |
| GENDER | |||||||||||||
| Male | 514 | 62 | 9.4 | 7.2-12.2 | *** | *** | *** | 447 | 90.1 | 87.2-92.4 | *** | *** | *** |
| Female | 706 | 89 | 11.7 | 9.2-14.6 | *** | *** | *** | 590 | 83.9 | 80.5-86.8 | 17 | 2.2 | 1.3- 3.8 |
| RACE | |||||||||||||
| Non-Hispanic White | 803 | 92 | 9.6 | 7.7-11.9 | *** | *** | *** | 695 | 88.6 | 86.1-90.7 | 14 | 1.4 | 0.8- 2.5 |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 240 | 47 | 17.7 | 12.9-23.8 | *** | *** | *** | 185 | 79.3 | 73.0-84.5 | *** | *** | *** |
| Other | 153 | 11 | 5.8 | 3.1-10.7 | *** | *** | *** | 134 | 88.3 | 81.1-93.0 | *** | *** | *** |
| AGE | |||||||||||||
| 18-44 | 417 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | 393 | 94.4 | 91.6-96.4 | *** | *** | *** |
| 44-64 | 479 | 67 | 14.7 | 11.3-18.9 | *** | *** | *** | 403 | 83.7 | 79.4-87.2 | *** | *** | *** |
| 65+ | 306 | 74 | 26.9 | 21.5-33.0 | *** | *** | *** | 223 | 71.1 | 64.9-76.5 | *** | *** | *** |
| EDUCATION | |||||||||||||
| H.S. or Less | 438 | 75 | 14.8 | 11.5-18.7 | *** | *** | *** | 351 | 82.7 | 78.5-86.3 | *** | *** | *** |
| Some College + | 774 | 75 | 7.8 | 6.1-10.0 | *** | *** | *** | 680 | 89.6 | 87.1-91.7 | 14 | 1.6 | 0.9- 2.9 |
| HOUSEHOLD INCOME | |||||||||||||
| Less than $50,000 | 522 | 85 | 14.8 | 11.7-18.5 | *** | *** | *** | 416 | 80.9 | 76.7-84.4 | 13 | 2.0 | 1.1- 3.8 |
| $50,000+ | 430 | 34 | 6.6 | 4.6- 9.4 | *** | *** | *** | 392 | 92.5 | 89.5-94.7 | *** | *** | *** |
See Technical Notes for counties in Local Health Director, State and AHEC regions.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2015 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2015 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 21SEP16.
FOLLOW US