2018 BRFSS Survey Results: North Carolina Regions

Pre-Diabetes

Have you had a test for high blood sugar or diabetes within the past three years?*

View results for a demographic group:
 Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^		 Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 3,252 2,076 60.5 58.4-62.7 1,176 39.5 37.3-41.6
NC ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR REGIONS
Region 1 & 2 579 375 59.3 53.5-64.9 204 40.7 35.1-46.5
Region 3 291 194 62.7 55.7-69.3 97 37.3 30.7-44.3
Region 4 442 288 61.6 56.1-66.7 154 38.4 33.3-43.9
Region 5 371 226 59.7 53.7-65.4 145 40.3 34.6-46.3
Region 6 296 188 61.3 54.5-67.7 108 38.7 32.3-45.5
Region 7 412 261 60.2 54.4-65.8 151 39.8 34.2-45.6
Region 8 372 232 55.7 49.2-61.9 140 44.3 38.1-50.8
Region 9 & 10 490 312 60.4 54.5-65.9 178 39.6 34.1-45.5
STATE REGIONS
Eastern NC 1,176 743 58.4 54.6-62.1 433 41.6 37.9-45.4
Piedmont 1,404 902 61.7 58.6-64.6 502 38.3 35.4-41.4
Western NC 673 431 59.2 54.0-64.2 242 40.8 35.8-46.0
AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC)
Mountain AHEC 516 336 58.6 52.4-64.5 180 41.4 35.5-47.6
Northwest 460 299 59.5 53.7-65.1 161 40.5 34.9-46.3
Charlotte 344 230 64.7 58.7-70.2 114 35.3 29.8-41.3
Greensboro 298 184 61.4 54.8-67.6 114 38.6 32.4-45.2
Southern Regional 374 237 60.4 54.2-66.3 137 39.6 33.7-45.8
Southeast 205 124 50.9 42.4-59.3 81 49.1 40.7-57.6
Wake 449 283 60.4 54.9-65.6 166 39.6 34.4-45.1
Area L & Eastern 607 383 59.1 53.6-64.4 224 40.9 35.6-46.4
NC MEDICAID MANAGED CARE REGIONS
Region 1 579 375 59.3 53.5-64.9 204 40.7 35.1-46.5
Region 2 462 305 64.7 59.4-69.6 157 35.3 30.4-40.6
Region 3 450 296 62.3 56.9-67.3 154 37.7 32.7-43.1
Region 4 588 359 58.1 53.2-62.9 229 41.9 37.1-46.8
Region 5 588 373 58.9 53.9-63.6 215 41.1 36.4-46.1
Region 6 586 368 58.8 53.4-64.1 218 41.2 35.9-46.6

Back to Pre-Diabetes.

*The pre-diabetes screening question is asked only of respondents who reported NOT having diabetes, or NOT having pre-diabetes
as reported in the Chronic Health Conditions Module.

See Technical Notes for counties in Local Health Director, State and AHEC regions.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2018 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2018 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 17SEP19.

SCHS Home | FAQs | Contacts