2018 BRFSS Survey Results: North Carolina Regions

Chronic Health Conditions

History of Any Cardiovascular Diseases (heart attack or coronary heart disease or stroke)*

View results for a demographic group:
Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^
Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 4,701 598 10.3 9.3-11.3 4,103 89.7 88.7-90.7
NC ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR REGIONS
Region 1 & 2 765 106 10.6 8.2-13.5 659 89.4 86.5-91.8
Region 3 398 62 10.5 7.9-13.9 336 89.5 86.1-92.1
Region 4 712 62 8.4 6.3-11.2 650 91.6 88.8-93.7
Region 5 551 60 9.4 7.0-12.5 491 90.6 87.5-93.0
Region 6 423 56 13.1 9.5-17.9 367 86.9 82.1-90.5
Region 7 623 70 10.1 7.7-13.0 553 89.9 87.0-92.3
Region 8 534 79 11.3 8.8-14.5 455 88.7 85.5-91.2
Region 9 & 10 701 103 12.6 10.0-15.9 598 87.4 84.1-90.0
STATE REGIONS
Eastern NC 1,697 242 12.1 10.3-14.1 1,455 87.9 85.9-89.7
Piedmont 2,122 230 9.1 7.8-10.7 1,892 90.9 89.3-92.2
Western NC 888 126 10.9 8.7-13.6 762 89.1 86.4-91.3
AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC)
Mountain AHEC 676 91 10.0 7.6-13.0 585 90.0 87.0-92.4
Northwest 644 92 10.1 7.7-13.1 552 89.9 86.9-92.3
Charlotte 565 49 8.6 6.1-11.8 516 91.4 88.2-93.9
Greensboro 445 52 10.6 7.8-14.4 393 89.4 85.6-92.2
Southern Regional 529 78 12.9 9.8-16.8 451 87.1 83.2-90.2
Southeast 269 37 10.9 7.6-15.5 232 89.1 84.5-92.4
Wake 680 65 8.5 6.4-11.1 615 91.5 88.9-93.6
Area L & Eastern 899 134 12.5 10.1-15.3 765 87.5 84.7-89.9
NC MEDICAID MANAGED CARE REGIONS
Region 1 765 106 10.6 8.2-13.5 659 89.4 86.5-91.8
Region 2 656 88 10.0 7.8-12.7 568 90.0 87.3-92.2
Region 3 722 64 8.5 6.4-11.3 658 91.5 88.7-93.6
Region 4 882 94 8.9 7.0-11.2 788 91.1 88.8-93.0
Region 5 817 115 12.8 10.2-16.0 702 87.2 84.0-89.8
Region 6 865 131 12.6 10.3-15.4 734 87.4 84.6-89.7

Back to Chronic Health Conditions.

*Data for this table were derived from the cardiovascular disease history questions.

See Technical Notes for counties in Local Health Director, State and AHEC regions.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2018 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2018 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 17SEP19.

SCHS Home | FAQs | Contacts