2018 BRFSS Survey Results: North Carolina Regions

Pre-Diabetes

Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you have pre-diabetes
or borderline diabetes?*

(See footnote for definition of Yes group.)

View results for a demographic group:
 Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^		 Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 3,382 449 12.1 10.8-13.6 2,933 87.9 86.4-89.2
NC ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR REGIONS
Region 1 & 2 603 97 15.2 11.6-19.6 506 84.8 80.4-88.4
Region 3 305 40 12.4 8.5-17.7 265 87.6 82.3-91.5
Region 4 465 52 11.0 8.1-14.7 413 89.0 85.3-91.9
Region 5 385 36 9.3 6.5-13.2 349 90.7 86.8-93.5
Region 6 303 38 10.6 7.4-15.0 265 89.4 85.0-92.6
Region 7 426 47 12.5 8.8-17.5 379 87.5 82.5-91.2
Region 8 388 58 13.6 10.0-18.2 330 86.4 81.8-90.0
Region 9 & 10 508 81 15.2 11.5-19.9 427 84.8 80.1-88.5
STATE REGIONS
Eastern NC 1,216 169 12.1 10.0-14.6 1,047 87.9 85.4-90.0
Piedmont 1,467 172 11.6 9.8-13.8 1,295 88.4 86.2-90.2
Western NC 700 108 14.2 11.0-18.0 592 85.8 82.0-89.0
AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC)
Mountain AHEC 536 93 17.1 13.1-22.0 443 82.9 78.0-86.9
Northwest 490 59 12.2 8.9-16.4 431 87.8 83.6-91.1
Charlotte 356 39 9.9 7.0-13.6 317 90.1 86.4-93.0
Greensboro 312 28 9.4 6.3-13.8 284 90.6 86.2-93.7
Southern Regional 382 45 11.3 8.0-15.8 337 88.7 84.2-92.0
Southeast 215 34 12.2 8.0-18.1 181 87.8 81.9-92.0
Wake 464 58 13.1 9.6-17.7 406 86.9 82.3-90.4
Area L & Eastern 628 93 13.3 10.2-17.3 535 86.7 82.7-89.8
NC MEDICAID MANAGED CARE REGIONS
Region 1 603 97 15.2 11.6-19.6 506 84.8 80.4-88.4
Region 2 483 56 10.6 7.8-14.3 427 89.4 85.7-92.2
Region 3 474 54 10.9 8.1-14.6 420 89.1 85.4-91.9
Region 4 608 67 12.1 9.1-15.9 541 87.9 84.1-90.9
Region 5 608 82 12.2 9.4-15.5 526 87.8 84.5-90.6
Region 6 607 93 13.6 10.5-17.5 514 86.4 82.5-89.5

Back to Pre-Diabetes.

*Females who reported being diagnosed with gestational pre-diabetes were included in the YES group.
The pre-diabetes screening question is asked only of respondents who reported NOT having diabetes, or NOT having pre-diabetes
as reported in the Chronic Health Conditions Module.

See Technical Notes for counties in Local Health Director, State and AHEC regions.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2018 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2018 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 17SEP19.

SCHS Home | FAQs | Contacts