NC Department of Health and Human Services
N.C. State Center for Health Statistics Home
N.C. Public Health Home

2019 BRFSS Survey Results: North Carolina Regions

Family Planning

Used Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (LARC) Method
(Calculated variable.)*

View results for a demographic group:
Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^
Yes, used LARC No, did not use LARC
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 588 70 12.9 10.0-16.5 518 87.1 83.5-90.0
NC ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR REGIONS
Region 1 & 2 60 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Region 3 37 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Region 4 95 11 12.5 6.7-22.0 84 87.5 78.0-93.3
Region 5 88 12 12.5 6.8-21.9 76 87.5 78.1-93.2
Region 6 72 *** *** *** 62 87.8 77.9-93.6
Region 7 118 13 11.8 6.6-20.3 105 88.2 79.7-93.4
Region 8 73 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Region 9 & 10 45 *** *** *** *** *** ***
STATE REGIONS
Eastern NC 191 23 14.1 8.9-21.6 168 85.9 78.4-91.1
Piedmont 327 40 12.4 8.9-17.0 287 87.6 83.0-91.1
Western NC 70 *** *** *** *** *** ***
AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC)
Mountain AHEC 47 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Northwest 67 *** *** *** 61 89.2 77.5-95.2
Charlotte 79 11 15.0 8.1-26.0 68 85.0 74.0-91.9
Greensboro 62 *** *** *** 54 87.9 76.2-94.3
Southern Regional 93 11 16.2 8.4-28.9 82 83.8 71.1-91.6
Southeast 27 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Wake 139 17 13.2 8.1-20.8 122 86.8 79.2-91.9
Area L & Eastern 74 *** *** *** 69 95.2 86.9-98.4
NC MEDICAID MANAGED CARE REGIONS
Region 1 68 *** *** *** *** *** ***
Region 2 51 *** *** *** 47 92.3 80.8-97.2
Region 3 73 11 15.6 8.3-27.4 62 84.4 72.6-91.7
Region 4 85 12 13.3 7.3-23.0 73 86.7 77.0-92.7
Region 5 98 *** *** *** 88 89.7 81.0-94.6
Region 6 92 *** *** *** 82 87.9 78.1-93.7

Back to Family Planning.

*Data in this table were derived from Family Planning questions 2, 3 and 4, asked of female respondents aged 18-49. Please see the 2019 BRFSS Technical Notes for details.

See Technical Notes for counties in Local Health Director, State and AHEC regions.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2019 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2019 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 09SEP20.

SCHS Home | FAQs | Contacts