View results for a demographic group: |
Select a different topic: |
View results for a different geographical area: |
Total Respond.^ |
Yes | No | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | C.I.(95%) | N | % | C.I.(95%) | ||
North Carolina | 562 | 196 | 35.5 | 31.0-40.3 | 366 | 64.5 | 59.7-69.0 |
NC ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR REGIONS | |||||||
Region 1 & 2 | 52 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Region 3 | 55 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Region 4 | 99 | 32 | 27.8 | 19.5-37.9 | 67 | 72.2 | 62.1-80.5 |
Region 5 | 62 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Region 6 | 65 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Region 7 | 77 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Region 8 | 88 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Region 9 & 10 | 64 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
STATE REGIONS | |||||||
Eastern NC | 235 | 74 | 33.9 | 27.1-41.3 | 161 | 66.1 | 58.7-72.9 |
Piedmont | 258 | 93 | 34.0 | 27.8-40.8 | 165 | 66.0 | 59.2-72.2 |
Western NC | 69 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC) | |||||||
Mountain AHEC | 35 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Northwest | 100 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Charlotte | 73 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Greensboro | 51 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Southern Regional | 103 | *** | *** | *** | 74 | 72.7 | 61.0-81.9 |
Southeast | 33 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Wake | 69 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Area L & Eastern | 98 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
NC MEDICAID MANAGED CARE REGIONS | |||||||
Region 1 | 76 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Region 2 | 69 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Region 3 | 61 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Region 4 | 60 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Region 5 | 95 | 27 | 22.9 | 14.8-33.7 | 68 | 77.1 | 66.3-85.2 |
Region 6 | 35 | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** |
*This question was asked of respondents with doctor-diagnosed diabetes.
See Technical Notes for counties in Local Health Director, State and AHEC regions.
PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2019 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.
***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2019 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.
^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.
BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes
This page was generated on 09SEP20.