2019 BRFSS Survey Results: North Carolina Regions

Pre-Diabetes

Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that you have pre-diabetes
or borderline diabetes?*

(See footnote for definition of Yes group.)

View results for a demographic group:
 Select a different topic:
View results for a different geographical area:
  Total
Respond.^		 Yes No
N % C.I.(95%) N % C.I.(95%)
North Carolina 3,080 427 13.6 12.2-15.1 2,653 86.4 84.9-87.8
NC ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL HEALTH DIRECTOR REGIONS
Region 1 & 2 317 37 12.2 8.2-17.9 280 87.8 82.1-91.8
Region 3 287 34 12.9 8.7-18.6 253 87.1 81.4-91.3
Region 4 571 69 11.7 9.0-15.0 502 88.3 85.0-91.0
Region 5 457 70 13.9 10.9-17.7 387 86.1 82.3-89.1
Region 6 305 45 14.2 10.4-19.0 260 85.8 81.0-89.6
Region 7 504 81 16.8 13.2-21.1 423 83.2 78.9-86.8
Region 8 362 54 13.3 9.7-18.0 308 86.7 82.0-90.3
Region 9 & 10 277 37 13.7 9.5-19.5 240 86.3 80.5-90.5
STATE REGIONS
Eastern NC 997 148 14.9 12.3-17.8 849 85.1 82.2-87.7
Piedmont 1,667 231 13.3 11.5-15.2 1,436 86.7 84.8-88.5
Western NC 416 48 12.2 8.6-17.1 368 87.8 82.9-91.4
AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERS (AHEC)
Mountain AHEC 257 28 10.7 6.5-17.1 229 89.3 82.9-93.5
Northwest 484 58 13.2 9.8-17.5 426 86.8 82.5-90.2
Charlotte 440 55 11.8 8.9-15.5 385 88.2 84.5-91.1
Greensboro 343 47 11.7 8.6-15.7 296 88.3 84.3-91.4
Southern Regional 391 52 11.1 8.2-15.0 339 88.9 85.0-91.8
Southeast 179 24 13.4 8.2-21.2 155 86.6 78.8-91.8
Wake 570 95 16.7 13.5-20.6 475 83.3 79.4-86.5
Area L & Eastern 416 68 17.8 13.6-23.0 348 82.2 77.0-86.4
NC MEDICAID MANAGED CARE REGIONS
Region 1 389 48 12.6 8.8-17.5 341 87.4 82.5-91.2
Region 2 379 45 13.1 9.3-18.1 334 86.9 81.9-90.7
Region 3 407 47 10.9 8.0-14.6 360 89.1 85.4-92.0
Region 4 428 68 14.3 11.1-18.3 360 85.7 81.7-88.9
Region 5 390 58 13.6 10.2-18.1 332 86.4 81.9-89.8
Region 6 366 48 14.7 10.6-20.1 318 85.3 79.9-89.4

Back to Pre-Diabetes.

*Females who reported being diagnosed with gestational pre-diabetes were included in the YES group.
The pre-diabetes screening question is asked only of respondents who reported NOT having diabetes, or NOT having pre-diabetes
as reported in the Chronic Health Conditions Module.

See Technical Notes for counties in Local Health Director, State and AHEC regions.

PLEASE NOTE: Due to changes in the weighting methodology and other factors, results from 2019 are NOT comparable to 2010
and earlier years.

***The estimate was suppressed because it did not meet statistical reliability standards. See BRFSS 2019 Annual Results Technical Notes for more details.

^Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics and therefore cannot be calculated exactly from the numbers in this table.

BRFSS Home | Annual Questionnaires | Technical Notes

This page was generated on 09SEP20.

SCHS Home | FAQs | Contacts